Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-122549-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 13:27:36 +0530
From: Ayush Tiwari <ayushtiw0110@gmail.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: alison.schofield@intel.com, paul@paul-moore.com, mic@digikod.net,
	fabio.maria.de.francesco@linux.intel.com,
	linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	outreachy@lists.linux.dev, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] LANDLOCK: use kmem_cache for landlock_object
Message-ID: <ZgUi8G3q0DvtcIQH@ayush-HP-Pavilion-Gaming-Laptop-15-ec0xxx>
References: <ZgSrBVidW1U6yP+h@ayush-HP-Pavilion-Gaming-Laptop-15-ec0xxx>
 <2024032836-grief-parish-88e7@gregkh>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2024032836-grief-parish-88e7@gregkh>

On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 07:08:04AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 04:55:57AM +0530, Ayush Tiwari wrote:
> > Use kmem_cache replace kzalloc() calls with kmem_cache_zalloc() for
> > struct landlock_object and update the related dependencies.
> 
> This says what you do, but not why you want to do any of this.  Why is
> this change needed?  What benifit does it bring?
> 
> And why did you cc: the staging mailing list?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
Hello Greg,
Apologies for the errors. I will resend the patch with reason also for
the changes I made. Earlier I didn't mention as I thought this patch is
regarding an Issue from the Issues List. But will keep this in mind from
now. Also, apologies for CC the staging mailing lists. I won't include
it from next time if it's not needed. Thanks.