Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-122674-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20240313235422.180075-1-andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240313235422.180075-1-andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:21:56 +0100
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZUnmnLj6ZJ8_p2tyN4txCA1fkSvqPo5gTqi=v33FToKg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/11] pinctrl: aw9523: number of cleanups
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@somainline.org>, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 12:54=E2=80=AFAM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:

> Just noticed that the newly introduced driver has some leftovers or unnee=
ded
> customisation. Hence this series. It may (or may not :-) be sent as an up=
date
> after v6.9-rc1 for v6.9 cycle, but TBH there is nothing functional critic=
al.

There is some speling mistake making patch 4 fail according to kernelbot,
if you rebase on v6.9-rc1 and fix patch 4 I think I can just apply the lot.

Thanks!
Linus Walleij