Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-122890-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 13:31:06 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	Russ Weight <russ.weight@linux.dev>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Dent Project <dentproject@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 11/17] dt-bindings: net: pse-pd: Add another
 way of describing several PSE PIs
Message-ID: <2d325acb-fc35-4ca3-80f2-ac88359578fd@lunn.ch>
References: <20240326-feature_poe-v6-0-c1011b6ea1cb@bootlin.com>
 <20240326-feature_poe-v6-11-c1011b6ea1cb@bootlin.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240326-feature_poe-v6-11-c1011b6ea1cb@bootlin.com>

> +          pairsets:
> +            $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
> +            description:
> +              List of phandles, each pointing to the power supply for the
> +              corresponding pairset named in 'pairset-names'. This property
> +              aligns with IEEE 802.3-2022, Section 33.2.3 and 145.2.4.
> +              PSE Pinout Alternatives (as per IEEE 802.3-2022 Table 145\u20133)
> +              |-----------|---------------|---------------|---------------|---------------|
> +              | Conductor | Alternative A | Alternative A | Alternative B | Alternative B |
> +              |           |    (MDI-X)    |     (MDI)     |      (X)      |      (S)      |
> +              |-----------|---------------|---------------|---------------|---------------|
> +              | 1         | Negative VPSE | Positive VPSE | \u2014             | \u2014             |
> +              | 2         | Negative VPSE | Positive VPSE | \u2014             | \u2014             |
> +              | 3         | Positive VPSE | Negative VPSE | \u2014             | \u2014             |
> +              | 4         | \u2014             | \u2014             | Negative VPSE | Positive VPSE |
> +              | 5         | \u2014             | \u2014             | Negative VPSE | Positive VPSE |
> +              | 6         | Positive VPSE | Negative VPSE | \u2014             | \u2014             |
> +              | 7         | \u2014             | \u2014             | Positive VPSE | Negative VPSE |
> +              | 8         | \u2014             | \u2014             | Positive VPSE | Negative VPSE |

Is it possible to avoid \u encoding? Ideally this documentation should
be understandable without having to render it using a toolset. I just
want to use less(1).

Or is this a email problem? Has something converted your UTF-8 file to
this \u notation?

     Andrew