Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760947AbYARONg (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:13:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757460AbYARON3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:13:29 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:40616 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755750AbYARON2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:13:28 -0500 Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:12:24 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bunk@kernel.org, Dave Kleikamp , Takashi Iwai , Shaohua Li , Jay Vosburgh , Alan Cox , Stephen Hemminger , Dmitry Torokhov , "Eric W. Biederman" , Alexey Starikovskiy , Geert Uytterhoeven Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc8-git1: Reported regressions from 2.6.23 Message-ID: <20080118141224.GA16963@elte.hu> References: <200801180035.42878.rjw@sisk.pl> <20080117155809.7ebc3bb7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <200801181510.10180.rjw@sisk.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200801181510.10180.rjw@sisk.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1408 Lines: 31 * Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > Subject : snd_hda_intel 2.6.24-rc2 bug: interrupts don't always work on Lenovo X60s > > > > Submitter : Roland Dreier > > > > Date : 2007-11-08 14:55 > > > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/8/255 > > > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9332 > > > > Handled-By : Takashi Iwai > > > > Ingo Molnar > > > > Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/16/66 > > > > This patch went in, but was reverted because it caused more problems than > > it fixed. And what it "fixed" was somewhat dubious anyway. > > It was reported to break suspend on one box, but Takashi wants it in, > AFAICS, as quite some time has been invested into figuring out what's > going wrong in that case. since this is about a weird, not fully understood hardware interfacing and timing problem, and because my original fix was not really a regression fix (but it indeed _caused_ a real regression in a previously working setup), i'd lean towards just reverting my patch in .24 and going with Takashi's fixes in .25. I.e. the current -git status quo. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/