Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-123045-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20240326222844.1422948-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> <20240326222844.1422948-7-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240326222844.1422948-7-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 15:13:56 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWdaiSer10agMytpv9h_gb4bEpEHjThDwRkMShXkKMxzA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 06/13] pinctrl: renesas: pinctrl-rzg2l: Make cfg to
 u64 in struct rzg2l_variable_pin_cfg
To: Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, 
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, 
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, 
	Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@renesas.com>, 
	Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Prabhakar,

On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 11:30=E2=80=AFPM Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.=
com> wrote:
> From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
>
> Now that we have updated the macro PIN_CFG_MASK to allow for the maximum
> configuration bits, update the size of 'cfg' to 'u64' in the
> 'struct rzg2l_variable_pin_cfg'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>

Thanks for your patch!

> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c
> @@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ struct rzg2l_dedicated_configs {
>   * @pin: port pin
>   */
>  struct rzg2l_variable_pin_cfg {
> -       u32 cfg:20;
> +       u64 cfg:46;
>         u32 port:5;
>         u32 pin:3;

Doesn't this store the 46 cfg bits in a 64-bit word, and the 8 port
and pin bits in a different 32-bit word?  Worse, you'll get 4 bytes
of padding at the end of the structure.
Changing the port and pin to u64 should make sure everything is
stored together in a single 64-bit word.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--=20
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k=
org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. Bu=
t
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like t=
hat.
                                -- Linus Torvalds