Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760885AbYAROXy (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:23:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756944AbYAROXp (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:23:45 -0500 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:38928 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756796AbYAROXo (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:23:44 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: echo mem > /sys/power/state Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:26:15 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 20070904.708012) Cc: Andrew Morton , Zan Lynx , Thomas Gleixner , Len Brown , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20080116222445.6f7ff66e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080118004725.dcd132ee.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080118121803.GF11044@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20080118121803.GF11044@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801181526.16967.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1627 Lines: 39 On Friday, 18 of January 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > (it doesnt matter if graphics does not resume fine - at least for my > > > tests) > > > > > > kprobes had similar problems and it now has a few simple smoke-tests > > > - which i just saw trigger on a patch that i did not notice would > > > break kprobes. I think this should be done for all functionality > > > that is not regularly triggered by a normal distro bootup (and which > > > is easy to overlook in testing). > > > > Seeing as we're so lame about being able to distribute userspace > > stuff: create a shell script in /proc/rc.kernel and start teaching > > initscripts to run it. Then we can modify it at will. > > would be fine to me. Yes, that might work. > The problem isnt just distribution and the tests > getting out of sync with the kernel (and its capabilities enabled in the > .config, etc.), the other problem is unintrusive testing: i for example > use unmodified images of various distributions, with only a new bzImage > plopped in. That is an intentionally minimal impact test vector, any > userspace side changes are discouraged. And that's how many people test > new kernels, they just plop it in. The moment we require any userlevel > changes, the testing barrier increases significantly. Very true. Greetings, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/