Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-123495-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
From: Karel Balej <balejk@matfyz.cz>
To: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@leemhuis.info>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        regressions@lists.linux.dev, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, workflows@vger.kernel.org
Cc: balejk@matfyz.cz
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] regressions documentation improvements
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 20:29:14 +0100
Message-ID: <20240328194342.11760-1-balejk@matfyz.cz>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Hello,

this small series suggests two (hopefully) improvements for the
regressions-related documentation texts.

The first one is perhaps unnecessarily nitpicky but if nothing else, it
at least adds a missing word.

The other one tries to clarify for future readers a question which was
on my mind through the whole process during my first attempt at
reporting a regression.

Please take a look, I am eager to hear what you think.

Thank you, kind regards,
K. B.

Karel Balej (2):
  docs: *-regressions.rst: unify quoting, add missing word
  docs: handling-regressions.rst: clarify that "Closes:" tags work too

 .../admin-guide/reporting-regressions.rst     | 10 +++---
 .../process/handling-regressions.rst          | 32 ++++++++++---------
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

-- 
2.44.0