From: Jesse Barnes <jesse.barnes@intel.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 02/11] PAT x86: Map only usable memory in x86_64 identity map and kernel text
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 08:46:02 -0800
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20071204.744707)
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
       "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
       "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
       ebiederm@xmission.com, rdreier@cisco.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
       gregkh@suse.de, airlied@skynet.ie, davej@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
References: <p737iiho5yq.fsf@bingen.suse.de> <20080118120112.GB8583@elte.hu> <20080118131209.GA16459@one.firstfloor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20080118131209.GA16459@one.firstfloor.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200801180846.03161.jesse.barnes@intel.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 807
Lines: 18

On Friday, January 18, 2008 5:12 am Andi Kleen wrote:
> > (AMD machines apparently don't need it
>
> That's not true -- we had AMD systems in the past with broken MTRRs for
> large memory configurations too,  Mostly it was pre revE though.

It should be easy enough to enable it for AMD as well, and it would also be 
good to track down the one failure you found...  I don't *think* the 
re-ordering of MTRR initialization should affect AMDs anymore than it does 
Intel, but someone familiar with the boot code would have to do a quick audit 
to be sure.

Jesse
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/