Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-124142-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
From: Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>
To: paul.walmsley@sifive.com,
	rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com,
	broonie@kernel.org,
	Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com,
	kito.cheng@sifive.com,
	keescook@chromium.org,
	ajones@ventanamicro.com,
	conor.dooley@microchip.com,
	cleger@rivosinc.com,
	atishp@atishpatra.org,
	alex@ghiti.fr,
	bjorn@rivosinc.com,
	alexghiti@rivosinc.com,
	samuel.holland@sifive.com,
	palmer@sifive.com,
	conor@kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Cc: corbet@lwn.net,
	tech-j-ext@lists.risc-v.org,
	palmer@dabbelt.com,
	aou@eecs.berkeley.edu,
	robh+dt@kernel.org,
	krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org,
	oleg@redhat.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	arnd@arndb.de,
	ebiederm@xmission.com,
	Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
	vbabka@suse.cz,
	lstoakes@gmail.com,
	shuah@kernel.org,
	brauner@kernel.org,
	debug@rivosinc.com,
	andy.chiu@sifive.com,
	jerry.shih@sifive.com,
	hankuan.chen@sifive.com,
	greentime.hu@sifive.com,
	evan@rivosinc.com,
	xiao.w.wang@intel.com,
	charlie@rivosinc.com,
	apatel@ventanamicro.com,
	mchitale@ventanamicro.com,
	dbarboza@ventanamicro.com,
	sameo@rivosinc.com,
	shikemeng@huaweicloud.com,
	willy@infradead.org,
	vincent.chen@sifive.com,
	guoren@kernel.org,
	samitolvanen@google.com,
	songshuaishuai@tinylab.org,
	gerg@kernel.org,
	heiko@sntech.de,
	bhe@redhat.com,
	jeeheng.sia@starfivetech.com,
	cyy@cyyself.name,
	maskray@google.com,
	ancientmodern4@gmail.com,
	mathis.salmen@matsal.de,
	cuiyunhui@bytedance.com,
	bgray@linux.ibm.com,
	mpe@ellerman.id.au,
	baruch@tkos.co.il,
	alx@kernel.org,
	david@redhat.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	revest@chromium.org,
	josh@joshtriplett.org,
	shr@devkernel.io,
	deller@gmx.de,
	omosnace@redhat.com,
	ojeda@kernel.org,
	jhubbard@nvidia.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 25/27] riscv: Documentation for landing pad / indirect branch tracking
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 21:44:57 -0700
Message-Id: <20240329044459.3990638-26-debug@rivosinc.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240329044459.3990638-1-debug@rivosinc.com>
References: <20240329044459.3990638-1-debug@rivosinc.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Adding documentation on landing pad aka indirect branch tracking on riscv
and kernel interfaces exposed so that user tasks can enable it.

Signed-off-by: Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>
---
 Documentation/arch/riscv/zicfilp.rst | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 104 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/arch/riscv/zicfilp.rst

diff --git a/Documentation/arch/riscv/zicfilp.rst b/Documentation/arch/riscv/zicfilp.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..3007c81f0465
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/arch/riscv/zicfilp.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+:Author: Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>
+:Date:   12 January 2024
+
+====================================================
+Tracking indirect control transfers on RISC-V Linux
+====================================================
+
+This document briefly describes the interface provided to userspace by Linux
+to enable indirect branch tracking for user mode applications on RISV-V
+
+1. Feature Overview
+--------------------
+
+Memory corruption issues usually result in to crashes, however when in hands of
+an adversary and if used creatively can result into variety security issues.
+
+One of those security issues can be code re-use attacks on program where adversary
+can use corrupt function pointers and chain them together to perform jump oriented
+programming (JOP) or call oriented programming (COP) and thus compromising control
+flow integrity (CFI) of the program.
+
+Function pointers live in read-write memory and thus are susceptible to corruption
+and allows an adversary to reach any program counter (PC) in address space. On
+RISC-V zicfilp extension enforces a restriction on such indirect control transfers
+
+	- indirect control transfers must land on a landing pad instruction `lpad`.
+	  There are two exception to this rule
+		- rs1 = x1 or rs1 = x5, i.e. a return from a function and returns are
+		  protected using shadow stack (see zicfiss.rst)
+
+		- rs1 = x7. On RISC-V compiler usually does below to reach function
+		  which is beyond the offset possible J-type instruction.
+
+			"auipc x7, <imm>"
+			"jalr (x7)"
+
+		  Such form of indirect control transfer are still immutable and don't rely
+		  on memory and thus rs1=x7 is exempted from tracking and considered software
+		  guarded jumps.
+
+`lpad` instruction is pseudo of `auipc rd, <imm_20bit>` and is a HINT nop. `lpad`
+instruction must be aligned on 4 byte boundary and compares 20 bit immediate with x7.
+If `imm_20bit` == 0, CPU don't perform any comparision with x7. If `imm_20bit` != 0,
+then `imm_20bit` must match x7 else CPU will raise `software check exception`
+(cause=18)with `*tval = 2`.
+
+Compiler can generate a hash over function signatures and setup them (truncated
+to 20bit) in x7 at callsites and function proglogs can have `lpad` with same
+function hash. This further reduces number of program counters a call site can
+reach.
+
+2. ELF and psABI
+-----------------
+
+Toolchain sets up `GNU_PROPERTY_RISCV_FEATURE_1_FCFI` for property
+`GNU_PROPERTY_RISCV_FEATURE_1_AND` in notes section of the object file.
+
+3. Linux enabling
+------------------
+
+User space programs can have multiple shared objects loaded in its address space
+and it's a difficult task to make sure all the dependencies have been compiled
+with support of indirect branch. Thus it's left to dynamic loader to enable
+indirect branch tracking for the program.
+
+4. prctl() enabling
+--------------------
+
+`PR_SET_INDIR_BR_LP_STATUS` / `PR_GET_INDIR_BR_LP_STATUS` /
+`PR_LOCK_INDIR_BR_LP_STATUS` are three prctls added to manage indirect branch
+tracking. prctls are arch agnostic and returns -EINVAL on other arches.
+
+`PR_SET_INDIR_BR_LP_STATUS`: If arg1 `PR_INDIR_BR_LP_ENABLE` and if CPU supports
+`zicfilp` then kernel will enabled indirect branch tracking for the task.
+Dynamic loader can issue this `prctl` once it has determined that all the objects
+loaded in address space support indirect branch tracking. Additionally if there is
+a `dlopen` to an object which wasn't compiled with `zicfilp`, dynamic loader can
+issue this prctl with arg1 set to 0 (i.e. `PR_INDIR_BR_LP_ENABLE` being clear)
+
+`PR_GET_INDIR_BR_LP_STATUS`: Returns current status of indirect branch tracking.
+If enabled it'll return `PR_INDIR_BR_LP_ENABLE`
+
+`PR_LOCK_INDIR_BR_LP_STATUS`: Locks current status of indirect branch tracking on
+the task. User space may want to run with strict security posture and wouldn't want
+loading of objects without `zicfilp` support in it and thus would want to disallow
+disabling of indirect branch tracking. In that case user space can use this prctl
+to lock current settings.
+
+5. violations related to indirect branch tracking
+--------------------------------------------------
+
+Pertaining to indirect branch tracking, CPU raises software check exception in
+following conditions
+	- missing `lpad` after indirect call / jmp
+	- `lpad` not on 4 byte boundary
+	- `imm_20bit` embedded in `lpad` instruction doesn't match with `x7`
+
+In all 3 cases, `*tval = 2` is captured and software check exception is raised
+(cause=18)
+
+Linux kernel will treat this as `SIGSEV`` with code = `SEGV_CPERR` and follow
+normal course of signal delivery.
-- 
2.43.2