Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-125085-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CANiq72mkHM3qfq66oDZyZMCuLK8Y1tJxEqFhSYpFWg7ihfcvEA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20240329140030.3989-1-kernel@valentinobst.de>
In-Reply-To: <20240329140030.3989-1-kernel@valentinobst.de>
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 15:26:02 +0100
Message-ID: <CANiq72nuRGUqi7JxdNpFPyTD2onNXvujZHk_5xuxwFSxqWh0xQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] In-place module initialisation
To: Valentin Obst <kernel@valentinobst.de>
Cc: a.hindborg@samsung.com, alex.gaynor@gmail.com, aliceryhl@google.com, 
	benno.lossin@proton.me, bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com, 
	gary@garyguo.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ojeda@kernel.org, 
	rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, walmeida@microsoft.com, wedsonaf@gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 3:00=E2=80=AFPM Valentin Obst <kernel@valentinobst.=
de> wrote:
>
> If I interpret the docs correctly, previous patches in the same series ar=
e
> only implicitly considered as prerequisites for the marked patch if they
> are marked themselves:
>
>     "[...] you do not have to list patch1 as prerequisite of patch2
>     if you have already marked patch1 for stable inclusion."

Right, "Cc: stable" would be needed in both 1/5 and 2/5 (but one could
remove the "# ..." comments in that case, i.e. it seems simpler).

Cheers,
Miguel