Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1765871AbYARU4W (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:56:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761424AbYARU4M (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:56:12 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:38446 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761384AbYARU4J (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:56:09 -0500 Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:54:15 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Dave Jones , Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Linus Torvalds , "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" , ak@muc.de, ebiederm@xmission.com, rdreier@cisco.com, gregkh@suse.de, airlied@skynet.ie, tglx@linutronix.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, arjan@infradead.org, "Barnes, Jesse" , davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Siddha, Suresh B" Subject: Re: [patch 02/11] PAT x86: Map only usable memory in x86_64 identity map and kernel text Message-ID: <20080118205415.GB9776@elte.hu> References: <11912.1200005441@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <20080118182727.GB10167@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080118182727.GB10167@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1050 Lines: 24 * Dave Jones wrote: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 05:50:41PM -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > > > (Personally, I keep a copy of Arjan's "restrict devmem" patch from Fedora > > around, so I guess that says which camp I belong in, and the fact it's a Fedora > > patch and not mainstream says something too...) > > The way that patch is right now (and has been for some time) is kind > of nasty, and could use cleaning up. I made a half-assed attempt at > improving it a little over xmas, but it could rewriting from scratch. > That's the only reason I never bothered pushing it (and I assume, the > reason that Arjan didn't push it when he wrote the original). could someone please send it into this thread so that we can have a go at integrating it into x86.git? Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/