Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932568AbYARW2h (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:28:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762534AbYARW22 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:28:28 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:40145 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755593AbYARW21 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:28:27 -0500 To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: Arjan van de Ven , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [patch 2/3] Latencytop instrumentations part 1 References: <4790E3A6.7060807@linux.intel.com> <20080118094048.10e79ff9@laptopd505.fenrus.org> From: fche@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler) Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:26:09 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20080118094048.10e79ff9@laptopd505.fenrus.org> (Arjan van de Ven's message of "Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:40:48 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 697 Lines: 18 Arjan van de Ven writes: > This patch contains the first set of instrumentations for latencytop; > each instrumentation needs to be evaluated for usefulness before this > can go into mainline; posting here just to show how the infrastructure > can be used > [...] Can you suggest of some reason why all this instrumentation could not be in the form of standard markers (perhaps conditionally compiled out if necessary)? - FChE -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/