Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 17:11:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 17:11:12 -0500 Received: from svr3.applink.net ([206.50.88.3]:21766 "EHLO svr3.applink.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 17:11:06 -0500 Message-Id: <200201032210.g03MAsSr028379@svr3.applink.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Timothy Covell Reply-To: timothy.covell@ashavan.org To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: more M$ theft Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 16:07:13 -0600 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MS didn't give IE away they just made it part of the windows tax. That's NOT what they said under oath in court: For those of you doing the Internet long enough to remember, you may recall that MS wasn't up to writing a browser of their own to challenge Netscape: So instead, they decided to buy one (or actually, steal one, as you'll see in a moment.) The only thing that was even close to being a Netscape competitor in those days was the original NCSA Mosaic code, which was spun off for commercialization by UIUC(.edu) as a company called Spyglass. Spyglass tried unsuccessfully for a while to land big buyers in hopes of competing with Netscape, but their code wasn't nearly so good as the Mozilla crowds' (back before Mozillla meant open source...) Finally, they landed the biggest fish of them all, Microsoft: They struck a deal with Microsoft to be the Microsoft browser: with backing and volume like that, they couldn't lose! Spyglass poured millions into develpoment and features that Microsoft wanted in the product - they knew they'd get their money back because the contract with Microsoft guaranteed them a percentage cut of every copy sold. But Microsoft NEVER SOLD A BROWSER! Instead, it simply became "part of the operating system" (avoiding having to pay Spyglass was one of the biggest reasons BillG wanted to claim this.) There was, of course, a law suit about this, which Microsoft won by swearing that since IE was an integral part of the OS, and not something that was even possible to buy separately, they owed Spyglass nothing for the millions of copies of their code that they distributed: Since they had'nt sold any IE they owed no royalties! Microsoft won leaving Spyglass with nothing for all its hard work and destitute to the point that they finally had to sell out to OpenTV in the hopes of becoming a niche browser for set-top boxes... -- timothy.covell@ashavan.org. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/