Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763531AbYASBZG (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:25:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757260AbYASBYy (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:24:54 -0500 Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.182]:25254 "EHLO py-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756295AbYASBYx (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:24:53 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=AfuLRnLCZVaYQiCNOYY7BAkgfDqmZE4O5tcZh5s8X1bJzZyR17SqdtJB9TPsHnMP84gZ/+CHkbSqyWvlNh5HVCO0bKEPqRk75fnKc5Ud6j3BAP5IG6DO9Sh89Sf2tfO8IwajzbM9BDN1FxFJkgp3ViQyXa1Z0ap4MNEvVadVmu8= Message-ID: <5d6222a80801181724p40bdedebgded1d43b052d168e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:24:51 -0200 From: "Glauber de Oliveira Costa" To: "Ingo Molnar" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/10] Tree fixes for PARAVIRT Cc: "Zachary Amsden" , "Glauber de Oliveira Costa" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de, ehabkost@redhat.com, jeremy@goop.org, avi@qumranet.com, anthony@codemonkey.ws, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, ak@suse.de, chrisw@sous-sol.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, hpa@zytor.com, roland@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20080118220200.GA1071@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <12006768251548-git-send-email-gcosta@redhat.com> <20080118203259.GA3079@elte.hu> <20080118213711.GA24979@elte.hu> <1200693248.21817.157.camel@bodhitayantram.eng.vmware.com> <20080118220200.GA1071@elte.hu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1288 Lines: 35 On Jan 18, 2008 8:02 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Zachary Amsden wrote: > > > > but in exchange you broke all of 32-bit with CONFIG_PARAVIRT=y. > > > Which means you did not even build-test it on 32-bit, let alone boot > > > test it... > > > > Why are we rushing so much to do 64-bit paravirt that we are breaking > > working configurations? If the developement is going to be this > > chaotic, it should be done and tested out of tree until it can > > stabilize. > > what you see is a open feedback cycle conducted on lkml. People send > patches for arch/x86, and we tell them if it breaks something. The bug > was found before i pushed out the x86.git devel tree (and the fix is > below - but this shouldnt matter to you because the bug never hit a > public x86.git tree). > > Ingo > Other than this, it seems to build and boot fine. Do you want me to resend ? -- Glauber de Oliveira Costa. "Free as in Freedom" http://glommer.net "The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/