Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-127783-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1;
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 12:52:10 +0200
From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= <kw@linux.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
	Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mhi@lists.linux.dev, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] PCI: endpoint: Rename core_init() callback in
 'struct pci_epc_event_ops' to init()
Message-ID: <ZgvjWtC0f1CY6DJs@ryzen>
References: <20240401-pci-epf-rework-v2-0-970dbe90b99d@linaro.org>
 <20240401-pci-epf-rework-v2-3-970dbe90b99d@linaro.org>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240401-pci-epf-rework-v2-3-970dbe90b99d@linaro.org>

On Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 09:20:29PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> core_init() callback is used to notify the EPC initialization event to the
> EPF drivers. The 'core' prefix was used indicate that the controller IP
> core has completed initialization. But it serves no purpose as the EPF
> driver will only care about the EPC initialization as a whole and there is
> no real benefit to distinguish the IP core part.
> 
> So let's rename the core_init() callback in 'struct pci_epc_event_ops' to
> just init() to make it more clear.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-mhi.c  |  4 ++--
>  drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c |  4 ++--
>  drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c           | 16 ++++++++--------
>  include/linux/pci-epf.h                       |  4 ++--
>  4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-mhi.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-mhi.c
> index 280863c0eeb9..b3c26ffd29a5 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-mhi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-mhi.c
> @@ -716,7 +716,7 @@ static void pci_epf_mhi_dma_deinit(struct pci_epf_mhi *epf_mhi)
>  	epf_mhi->dma_chan_rx = NULL;
>  }
>  
> -static int pci_epf_mhi_core_init(struct pci_epf *epf)
> +static int pci_epf_mhi_epc_init(struct pci_epf *epf)
>  {
>  	struct pci_epf_mhi *epf_mhi = epf_get_drvdata(epf);
>  	const struct pci_epf_mhi_ep_info *info = epf_mhi->info;
> @@ -897,7 +897,7 @@ static void pci_epf_mhi_unbind(struct pci_epf *epf)
>  }
>  
>  static const struct pci_epc_event_ops pci_epf_mhi_epc_event_ops = {
> -	.core_init = pci_epf_mhi_core_init,
> +	.init = pci_epf_mhi_epc_init,
>  };
>  
>  static const struct pci_epc_bus_event_ops pci_epf_mhi_bus_event_ops = {
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> index 973db0b1bde2..abcb6ca61c4e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> @@ -731,7 +731,7 @@ static int pci_epf_test_set_bar(struct pci_epf *epf)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int pci_epf_test_core_init(struct pci_epf *epf)
> +static int pci_epf_test_epc_init(struct pci_epf *epf)

On V1 you agreed that it is better to remove 'epc' from the naming.
(For both pci-epf-test and pci-epf-mhi).
You seem to have forgotten to address this for V2.


Kind regards,
Niklas