Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-127987-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 13:56:40 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
CC: Yangyu Chen <cyy@cyyself.name>, <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, Conor
 Dooley <conor@kernel.org>, Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>, Rob Herring
	<robh+dt@kernel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
	<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>, Paul Walmsley
	<paul.walmsley@sifive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>, Albert Ou
	<aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>, Michael Turquette
	<mturquette@baylibre.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Philipp Zabel
	<p.zabel@pengutronix.de>, <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 08/11] pinctrl: k210: Deprecate SOC_CANAAN and use
 SOC_CANAAN_K210
Message-ID: <20240402-automatic-radial-7bc7dc342987@wendy>
References: <tencent_F76EB8D731C521C18D5D7C4F8229DAA58E08@qq.com>
 <tencent_6D10A9C63E3E0F412EED33477B5CDB98C207@qq.com>
 <CACRpkdY1wpGM7M5QV5rN0M6JMN_yugQJ7CEtnQjzsheD5AT23A@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mWQUdRed7U+WvCby"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdY1wpGM7M5QV5rN0M6JMN_yugQJ7CEtnQjzsheD5AT23A@mail.gmail.com>

--mWQUdRed7U+WvCby
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 02:31:36PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 1:13=E2=80=AFPM Yangyu Chen <cyy@cyyself.name> wr=
ote:
>=20
> > Since SOC_FOO should be deprecated from patch [1], and cleanup for other
> > SoCs is already on the mailing list [2,3,4], we remove the use of
> > SOC_CANAAN and introduced SOC_CANAAN_K210 for K210-specific drivers,
> >
> > Thus, we replace its drivers depends on SOC_CANAAN_K210 and default sel=
ect
> > when it has the symbol SOC_CANAAN_K210.
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20221121221414.109965-1-conor@k=
ernel.org/
> > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20240305-praying-clad-c4fbcaa7e=
d0a@spud/
> > [3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20240305-fled-undrilled-41dc0c4=
6bb29@spud/
> > [4] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20240305-stress-earflap-d7ddb86=
55a4d@spud/
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yangyu Chen <cyy@cyyself.name>
>=20
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>=20
> Is this patch something I can just apply to the pinctrl tree?

The new symbol doesn't exist in the pinctrl tree, so the driver will
cease to be compilable. Yangyu sent a standalone version of these symbol
changes:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/tencent_DB11214C8D0D7C48829ADA128E7BB8F13108@qq=
=2Ecom/
That whole series needs to go through one tree though, for the same reason.

If your ack transfers to that (identical patch) I can take the whole lot
via the soc tree for v6.10.

--mWQUdRed7U+WvCby
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZgwAiAAKCRB4tDGHoIJi
0vAXAQCeH+Yhvgq6/ASIgmTJPZ4FUkxGBC6xwyyibvKsGIjFQwD/cR8dZLkzZWnx
k50eNNnRBJ2KI81TqZySRvwHsgO/bA8=
=QFi9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--mWQUdRed7U+WvCby--