Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-128084-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20240306111157.29327-1-petr@tesarici.cz> <20240311182516.1e2eebd8@meshulam.tesarici.cz>
 <CANn89iKQpSaF5KG5=dT_o=WBeZtCiLcN768eUdYvUew-dLbKaA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20240311192118.31cfc1fb@meshulam.tesarici.cz> <764f2b10-9791-4861-9bef-7160fdb8f3ae@leemhuis.info>
 <72e39571-7122-4f6a-9252-83e663e4b703@leemhuis.info> <CANn89iKfMTGyyMB-x74J5bgzhM1RxSvuNhvXyWWv4DO8MZakSQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANn89iKfMTGyyMB-x74J5bgzhM1RxSvuNhvXyWWv4DO8MZakSQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 15:54:38 +0200
Message-ID: <CANn89iKPh0uR2mq4ThokwaF5iJA-N=9sXawi2H=-vLDn5Xfmug@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] u64_stats: fix u64_stats_init() for lockdep when used
 repeatedly in one file
To: Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>
Cc: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0ciBUZXNhxZnDrWs=?= <petr@tesarici.cz>, 
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, stable@kernel.org, 
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 3:42=E2=80=AFPM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> w=
rote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 3:40=E2=80=AFPM Linux regression tracking (Thorste=
n
> Leemhuis) <regressions@leemhuis.info> wrote:
> >
> > Hi. Top-posting for once, to make this easily accessible to everyone.
> >
> > Hmmm, looks like Petr's patch for a (minor) 6.8 regression didn't make
> > any progress in the past two weeks.
> >
> > Does nobody care? Did nobody merge it because no tree feels really
> > appropriate? Or am I missing something obvious and making a fool out of
> > myself by asking these questions? :D
>
> It happens, please resend the patch.

By 'resend' the patch, I meant : sending it to netdev@ mailing list so
that netdev patchwork can see it.