Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-128359-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Message-ID: <8b0b24bb-3c38-4f27-a2c9-f7d7adc4a115@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 18:39:31 +0200
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 13/13] mm/gup: Handle hugetlb in the generic
 follow_page_mask code
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>,
 "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
 Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>, John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
 Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>, Andrew Jones
 <andrew.jones@linux.dev>, Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
 linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
 Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
 Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>,
 Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
 linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Andrea Arcangeli
 <aarcange@redhat.com>, "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>,
 Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>,
 Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
 Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
References: <20240327152332.950956-1-peterx@redhat.com>
 <20240327152332.950956-14-peterx@redhat.com>
 <adfdd89b-ee56-4758-836e-c66a0be7de25@arm.com>
 <5d9dd9a7-e544-4741-944c-469b79c2c649@redhat.com> <ZgwwOq3XXKlS_7LQ@x1n>
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Autocrypt: addr=david@redhat.com; keydata=
 xsFNBFXLn5EBEAC+zYvAFJxCBY9Tr1xZgcESmxVNI/0ffzE/ZQOiHJl6mGkmA1R7/uUpiCjJ
 dBrn+lhhOYjjNefFQou6478faXE6o2AhmebqT4KiQoUQFV4R7y1KMEKoSyy8hQaK1umALTdL
 QZLQMzNE74ap+GDK0wnacPQFpcG1AE9RMq3aeErY5tujekBS32jfC/7AnH7I0v1v1TbbK3Gp
 XNeiN4QroO+5qaSr0ID2sz5jtBLRb15RMre27E1ImpaIv2Jw8NJgW0k/D1RyKCwaTsgRdwuK
 Kx/Y91XuSBdz0uOyU/S8kM1+ag0wvsGlpBVxRR/xw/E8M7TEwuCZQArqqTCmkG6HGcXFT0V9
 PXFNNgV5jXMQRwU0O/ztJIQqsE5LsUomE//bLwzj9IVsaQpKDqW6TAPjcdBDPLHvriq7kGjt
 WhVhdl0qEYB8lkBEU7V2Yb+SYhmhpDrti9Fq1EsmhiHSkxJcGREoMK/63r9WLZYI3+4W2rAc
 UucZa4OT27U5ZISjNg3Ev0rxU5UH2/pT4wJCfxwocmqaRr6UYmrtZmND89X0KigoFD/XSeVv
 jwBRNjPAubK9/k5NoRrYqztM9W6sJqrH8+UWZ1Idd/DdmogJh0gNC0+N42Za9yBRURfIdKSb
 B3JfpUqcWwE7vUaYrHG1nw54pLUoPG6sAA7Mehl3nd4pZUALHwARAQABzSREYXZpZCBIaWxk
 ZW5icmFuZCA8ZGF2aWRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbT7CwZgEEwEIAEICGwMGCwkIBwMCBhUIAgkKCwQW
 AgMBAh4BAheAAhkBFiEEG9nKrXNcTDpGDfzKTd4Q9wD/g1oFAl8Ox4kFCRKpKXgACgkQTd4Q
 9wD/g1oHcA//a6Tj7SBNjFNM1iNhWUo1lxAja0lpSodSnB2g4FCZ4R61SBR4l/psBL73xktp
 rDHrx4aSpwkRP6Epu6mLvhlfjmkRG4OynJ5HG1gfv7RJJfnUdUM1z5kdS8JBrOhMJS2c/gPf
 wv1TGRq2XdMPnfY2o0CxRqpcLkx4vBODvJGl2mQyJF/gPepdDfcT8/PY9BJ7FL6Hrq1gnAo4
 3Iv9qV0JiT2wmZciNyYQhmA1V6dyTRiQ4YAc31zOo2IM+xisPzeSHgw3ONY/XhYvfZ9r7W1l
 pNQdc2G+o4Di9NPFHQQhDw3YTRR1opJaTlRDzxYxzU6ZnUUBghxt9cwUWTpfCktkMZiPSDGd
 KgQBjnweV2jw9UOTxjb4LXqDjmSNkjDdQUOU69jGMUXgihvo4zhYcMX8F5gWdRtMR7DzW/YE
 BgVcyxNkMIXoY1aYj6npHYiNQesQlqjU6azjbH70/SXKM5tNRplgW8TNprMDuntdvV9wNkFs
 9TyM02V5aWxFfI42+aivc4KEw69SE9KXwC7FSf5wXzuTot97N9Phj/Z3+jx443jo2NR34XgF
 89cct7wJMjOF7bBefo0fPPZQuIma0Zym71cP61OP/i11ahNye6HGKfxGCOcs5wW9kRQEk8P9
 M/k2wt3mt/fCQnuP/mWutNPt95w9wSsUyATLmtNrwccz63XOwU0EVcufkQEQAOfX3n0g0fZz
 Bgm/S2zF/kxQKCEKP8ID+Vz8sy2GpDvveBq4H2Y34XWsT1zLJdvqPI4af4ZSMxuerWjXbVWb
 T6d4odQIG0fKx4F8NccDqbgHeZRNajXeeJ3R7gAzvWvQNLz4piHrO/B4tf8svmRBL0ZB5P5A
 2uhdwLU3NZuK22zpNn4is87BPWF8HhY0L5fafgDMOqnf4guJVJPYNPhUFzXUbPqOKOkL8ojk
 CXxkOFHAbjstSK5Ca3fKquY3rdX3DNo+EL7FvAiw1mUtS+5GeYE+RMnDCsVFm/C7kY8c2d0G
 NWkB9pJM5+mnIoFNxy7YBcldYATVeOHoY4LyaUWNnAvFYWp08dHWfZo9WCiJMuTfgtH9tc75
 7QanMVdPt6fDK8UUXIBLQ2TWr/sQKE9xtFuEmoQGlE1l6bGaDnnMLcYu+Asp3kDT0w4zYGsx
 5r6XQVRH4+5N6eHZiaeYtFOujp5n+pjBaQK7wUUjDilPQ5QMzIuCL4YjVoylWiBNknvQWBXS
 lQCWmavOT9sttGQXdPCC5ynI+1ymZC1ORZKANLnRAb0NH/UCzcsstw2TAkFnMEbo9Zu9w7Kv
 AxBQXWeXhJI9XQssfrf4Gusdqx8nPEpfOqCtbbwJMATbHyqLt7/oz/5deGuwxgb65pWIzufa
 N7eop7uh+6bezi+rugUI+w6DABEBAAHCwXwEGAEIACYCGwwWIQQb2cqtc1xMOkYN/MpN3hD3
 AP+DWgUCXw7HsgUJEqkpoQAKCRBN3hD3AP+DWrrpD/4qS3dyVRxDcDHIlmguXjC1Q5tZTwNB
 boaBTPHSy/Nksu0eY7x6HfQJ3xajVH32Ms6t1trDQmPx2iP5+7iDsb7OKAb5eOS8h+BEBDeq
 3ecsQDv0fFJOA9ag5O3LLNk+3x3q7e0uo06XMaY7UHS341ozXUUI7wC7iKfoUTv03iO9El5f
 XpNMx/YrIMduZ2+nd9Di7o5+KIwlb2mAB9sTNHdMrXesX8eBL6T9b+MZJk+mZuPxKNVfEQMQ
 a5SxUEADIPQTPNvBewdeI80yeOCrN+Zzwy/Mrx9EPeu59Y5vSJOx/z6OUImD/GhX7Xvkt3kq
 Er5KTrJz3++B6SH9pum9PuoE/k+nntJkNMmQpR4MCBaV/J9gIOPGodDKnjdng+mXliF3Ptu6
 3oxc2RCyGzTlxyMwuc2U5Q7KtUNTdDe8T0uE+9b8BLMVQDDfJjqY0VVqSUwImzTDLX9S4g/8
 kC4HRcclk8hpyhY2jKGluZO0awwTIMgVEzmTyBphDg/Gx7dZU1Xf8HFuE+UZ5UDHDTnwgv7E
 th6RC9+WrhDNspZ9fJjKWRbveQgUFCpe1sa77LAw+XFrKmBHXp9ZVIe90RMe2tRL06BGiRZr
 jPrnvUsUUsjRoRNJjKKA/REq+sAnhkNPPZ/NNMjaZ5b8Tovi8C0tmxiCHaQYqj7G2rgnT0kt
 WNyWQQ==
Organization: Red Hat
In-Reply-To: <ZgwwOq3XXKlS_7LQ@x1n>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 02.04.24 18:20, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 05:26:28PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 02.04.24 16:48, Ryan Roberts wrote:
>>> Hi Peter,
> 
> Hey, Ryan,
> 
> Thanks for the report!
> 
>>>
>>> On 27/03/2024 15:23, peterx@redhat.com wrote:
>>>> From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
>>>>
>>>> Now follow_page() is ready to handle hugetlb pages in whatever form, and
>>>> over all architectures.  Switch to the generic code path.
>>>>
>>>> Time to retire hugetlb_follow_page_mask(), following the previous
>>>> retirement of follow_hugetlb_page() in 4849807114b8.
>>>>
>>>> There may be a slight difference of how the loops run when processing slow
>>>> GUP over a large hugetlb range on cont_pte/cont_pmd supported archs: each
>>>> loop of __get_user_pages() will resolve one pgtable entry with the patch
>>>> applied, rather than relying on the size of hugetlb hstate, the latter may
>>>> cover multiple entries in one loop.
>>>>
>>>> A quick performance test on an aarch64 VM on M1 chip shows 15% degrade over
>>>> a tight loop of slow gup after the path switched.  That shouldn't be a
>>>> problem because slow-gup should not be a hot path for GUP in general: when
>>>> page is commonly present, fast-gup will already succeed, while when the
>>>> page is indeed missing and require a follow up page fault, the slow gup
>>>> degrade will probably buried in the fault paths anyway.  It also explains
>>>> why slow gup for THP used to be very slow before 57edfcfd3419 ("mm/gup:
>>>> accelerate thp gup even for "pages != NULL"") lands, the latter not part of
>>>> a performance analysis but a side benefit.  If the performance will be a
>>>> concern, we can consider handle CONT_PTE in follow_page().
>>>>
>>>> Before that is justified to be necessary, keep everything clean and simple.
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
>>>
>>> Afraid I'm seeing an oops when running gup_longterm test on arm64 with current mm-unstable. Git bisect blames this patch. The oops reproduces for me every time on 2 different machines:
>>>
>>>
>>> [    9.340416] kernel BUG at mm/gup.c:778!
>>> [    9.340746] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
>>> [    9.341199] Modules linked in:
>>> [    9.341481] CPU: 1 PID: 1159 Comm: gup_longterm Not tainted 6.9.0-rc2-00210-g910ff1a347e4 #11
>>> [    9.342232] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
>>> [    9.342647] pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
>>> [    9.343195] pc : follow_page_mask+0x4d4/0x880
>>> [    9.343580] lr : follow_page_mask+0x4d4/0x880
>>> [    9.344018] sp : ffff8000898b3aa0
>>> [    9.344345] x29: ffff8000898b3aa0 x28: fffffdffc53973e8 x27: 00003c0005d08000
>>> [    9.345028] x26: ffff00014e5cfd08 x25: ffffd3513a40c000 x24: fffffdffc5d08000
>>> [    9.345682] x23: ffffc1ffc0000000 x22: 0000000000080101 x21: ffff8000898b3ba8
>>> [    9.346337] x20: 0000fffff4200000 x19: ffff00014e52d508 x18: 0000000000000010
>>> [    9.347005] x17: 5f656e6f7a5f7369 x16: 2120262620296567 x15: 6170286461654865
>>> [    9.347713] x14: 6761502128454741 x13: 2929656761702865 x12: 6761705f65636976
>>> [    9.348371] x11: 65645f656e6f7a5f x10: ffffd3513b31d6e0 x9 : ffffd3513852f090
>>> [    9.349062] x8 : 00000000ffffefff x7 : ffffd3513b31d6e0 x6 : 0000000000000000
>>> [    9.349753] x5 : ffff00017ff98cc8 x4 : 0000000000000fff x3 : 0000000000000000
>>> [    9.350397] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : ffff000190e8b480 x0 : 0000000000000052
>>> [    9.351097] Call trace:
>>> [    9.351312]  follow_page_mask+0x4d4/0x880
>>> [    9.351700]  __get_user_pages+0xf4/0x3e8
>>> [    9.352089]  __gup_longterm_locked+0x204/0xa70
>>> [    9.352516]  pin_user_pages+0x88/0xc0
>>> [    9.352873]  gup_test_ioctl+0x860/0xc40
>>> [    9.353249]  __arm64_sys_ioctl+0xb0/0x100
>>> [    9.353648]  invoke_syscall+0x50/0x128
>>> [    9.354022]  el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x48/0xf8
>>> [    9.354488]  do_el0_svc+0x28/0x40
>>> [    9.354822]  el0_svc+0x34/0xe0
>>> [    9.355128]  el0t_64_sync_handler+0x13c/0x158
>>> [    9.355489]  el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x198
>>> [    9.355793] Code: aa1803e0 d000d8e1 91220021 97fff560 (d4210000)
>>> [    9.356280] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
>>> [    9.356651] note: gup_longterm[1159] exited with irqs disabled
>>> [    9.357141] note: gup_longterm[1159] exited with preempt_count 2
>>> [    9.358033] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>> [    9.358800] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 0 at kernel/context_tracking.c:128 ct_kernel_exit.constprop.0+0x108/0x120
>>> [    9.360157] Modules linked in:
>>> [    9.360541] CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Tainted: G      D            6.9.0-rc2-00210-g910ff1a347e4 #11
>>> [    9.361626] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
>>> [    9.362087] pstate: 204003c5 (nzCv DAIF +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
>>> [    9.362758] pc : ct_kernel_exit.constprop.0+0x108/0x120
>>> [    9.363306] lr : ct_idle_enter+0x10/0x20
>>> [    9.363845] sp : ffff8000801abdc0
>>> [    9.364222] x29: ffff8000801abdc0 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: 0000000000000000
>>> [    9.364961] x26: 0000000000000000 x25: ffff00014149d780 x24: 0000000000000000
>>> [    9.365557] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: ffffd3513b299d48 x21: ffffd3513a785730
>>> [    9.366239] x20: ffffd3513b299c28 x19: ffff00017ffa7da0 x18: 0000fffff5ffffff
>>> [    9.366869] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 1fffe0002a21a8c1 x15: 0000000000000000
>>> [    9.367524] x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000002
>>> [    9.368207] x11: 0000000000000001 x10: 0000000000000ad0 x9 : ffffd35138589230
>>> [    9.369123] x8 : ffff00014149e2b0 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 000000000f8c0fb2
>>> [    9.370403] x5 : 4000000000000002 x4 : ffff2cb045825000 x3 : ffff8000801abdc0
>>> [    9.371170] x2 : ffffd3513a782da0 x1 : 4000000000000000 x0 : ffffd3513a782da0
>>> [    9.372279] Call trace:
>>> [    9.372519]  ct_kernel_exit.constprop.0+0x108/0x120
>>> [    9.373216]  ct_idle_enter+0x10/0x20
>>> [    9.373562]  default_idle_call+0x3c/0x160
>>> [    9.374055]  do_idle+0x21c/0x280
>>> [    9.374394]  cpu_startup_entry+0x3c/0x50
>>> [    9.374797]  secondary_start_kernel+0x140/0x168
>>> [    9.375220]  __secondary_switched+0xb8/0xc0
>>> [    9.375875] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
>>>
>>>
>>> The oops trigger is at mm/gup.c:778:
>>> VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageHead(page) && !is_zone_device_page(page), page);
>>>
>>>
>>> This is the output of gup_longterm (last output is just before oops):
>>>
>>> # [INFO] detected hugetlb page size: 2048 KiB
>>> # [INFO] detected hugetlb page size: 32768 KiB
>>> # [INFO] detected hugetlb page size: 64 KiB
>>> # [INFO] detected hugetlb page size: 1048576 KiB
>>> TAP version 13
>>> 1..70
>>> # [RUN] R/W longterm GUP pin in MAP_SHARED file mapping ... with memfd
>>> ok 1 Should have worked
>>> # [RUN] R/W longterm GUP pin in MAP_SHARED file mapping ... with tmpfile
>>> ok 2 Should have failed
>>> # [RUN] R/W longterm GUP pin in MAP_SHARED file mapping ... with local tmpfile
>>> ok 3 Should have failed
>>> # [RUN] R/W longterm GUP pin in MAP_SHARED file mapping ... with memfd hugetlb (2048 kB)
>>> ok 4 Should have worked
>>> # [RUN] R/W longterm GUP pin in MAP_SHARED file mapping ... with memfd hugetlb (32768 kB)
>>>
>>>
>>> So 2M passed ok, and its failing for 32M, which is cont-pmd. I'm guessing you're trying to iterate 2M into a cont-pmd folio and ending up with an unexpected tail page?
>>
>> I assume we find the expected tail page, it's just that the check
>>
>> VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageHead(page) && !is_zone_device_page(page), page);
>>
>> Doesn't make sense with hugetlb folios. We might have a tail page mapped in
>> a cont-pmd entry. As soon as we call follow_huge_pmd() on "not the first
>> cont-pmd entry", we trigger this check.
>>
>> Likely this sanity check must also allow for hugetlb folios. Or we should
>> just remove it completely.
> 
> Right, IMHO it'll be easier we remove it, actually I see there's one more
> at the end, so I think we need to remove both.
> 
>>
>> In the past, we wanted to make sure that we never get tail pages of THP from
>> PMD entries, because something would currently be broken (we don't support
>> THP > PMD).
> 
> There's probably one more thing we need to do, on allowing
> PageAnonExclusive() to work with hugetlb tails. Even if we remove the
> warnings and if I read the code right, we can BUG_ON again on checking tail
> pages over anon-exclusive for PageHuge.
> 
> So I assume to fix it completely, we may need two changes: Patch 1 to
> prepare PageAnonExclusive() to work on hugetlb tails, then patch 2 to be
> squashed into the patch "mm/gup: handle huge pmd for follow_pmd_mask()".
> Note: not this patch to fixup, as this patch only does the "switchover" to
> the new path, the culprit should be the other patch..
> 
> I have them attached below first, before I'll also go and see whether I can
> run some arm tests later today or tomorrow.  David, any comments from
> anon-exclusive side?

I added the PageAnonExclusive checks for hugetlb back then, because 
calling it on a tail page indicated real trouble for hugetlb.

Well, and I didn't want to have runtime-hugetlb checks in 
PageAnonExclusive code called on certainly-not-hugetlb code paths.

Personally, I'd fixup the problematic callsite where we know nothing 
nasty is happening (like we did for gup_must_unshare(), because we don't 
expect hugetlb tail pages from arbitrary other code).

But as I'm getting closer to a folio_test_anon_exclusive() 
implementation as we speak (closer, but not done :) ... ), where I'd 
remove any such hugetlb special handling, I don't particularly care how 
we handle GUP here in the meantime.

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb