Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-128363-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 11:42:04 -0500
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	"Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	"Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	Megha Dey <megha.dey@intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] PCI/MSI: Remove IMS (Interrupt Message Store)
 support for now
Message-ID: <20240402164204.GA1809883@bhelgaas>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <BN9PR11MB5276DF6EF5910917DDB0EEAF8C3E2@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 02:45:50AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 7:23 AM
> > 
> > From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> > 
> > IMS (Interrupt Message Store) support appeared in v6.2, but there are no
> > users yet.
> > 
> > Remove it for now.  We can add it back when a user comes along.
> > 
> > Bjorn Helgaas (3):
> >   Revert "PCI/MSI: Provide stubs for IMS functions"
> >   Revert "PCI/MSI: Provide pci_ims_alloc/free_irq()"
> >   Revert "PCI/MSI: Provide IMS (Interrupt Message Store) support"
> > 
> 
> What about the other IMS related commits which are also dead
> code after above are reverted?
> 
> fa5745aca1dc ("iommu/amd: Enable PCI/IMS")
> 810531a1af53 ("iommu/vt-d: Enable PCI/IMS")
> 6e24c8877329 ("x86/apic/msi: Enable PCI/IMS")
> e23d4192bf9b ("genirq/msi: Provide constants for PCI/IMS support")

Thanks, I didn't catch those; will add in a v2.

Also, sorry for inadvertently sending this in the middle of an
unrelated thread.  I copied --in-reply-to from my notes when I
shouldn't have.

Bjorn