Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-128601-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4558251.LvFx2qVVIh@kreacher>
In-Reply-To: <4558251.LvFx2qVVIh@kreacher>
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 21:42:52 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0iSyTP4SbGBYESNy9NynMCQn8dojCFoOtQU4Q305ZKGTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] thermal: More separation between the core and drivers
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, 
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>, 
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>, Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>, 
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>, 
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 9:04=E2=80=AFPM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net=
> wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> This is an update of
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/4558384.LvFx2qVVIh@kreacher/
>
> and
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/2331888.ElGaqSPkdT@kreacher/
>
> which rebases the first patch on top of 6.9-rc2, adds 3 patches and adjus=
ts
> the third patch from v2.
>
> The original description of the first two patches still applies:
>
> > Patch [1/2] is based on the observation that the threshold field in str=
uct
> > thermal_trip really should be core-internal and to make that happen it
> > introduces a wrapper structure around struct thermal_trip for internal
> > use in the core.
> >
> > Patch [2/2] moves the definition of the new structure and the struct
> > thermal_zone_device one to a local header file in the core to enforce
> > more separation between the core and drivers.
> >
> > The patches are not expected to introduce any observable differences in
> > behavior, so please let me know if you see any of that.
>
> Note that these patches were first sent before the merge window and have =
not
> really changed since then (except for a minor rebase of the first patch i=
n
> this series).  Moreover, no comments regarding the merit of these patches
> have been made shared, so if this continues, I will be considering them a=
s
> good to go by the end of this week.
>
> Patch [3/6] is a rewrite of comments regarding trip crossing and threshol=
d
> computations.
>
> Patch [4/6] updates the trip crossing detection code to consolidate the
> threshold initialization with trip crossing on the way up.
>
> Patch [5/6] ([3/3] in v2) adds a mechanism to sort notifications and debu=
g
> calls taking place during one invocation of __thermal_zone_device_update(=
) so
> they always go in temperature order.
>
> Patch [6/6] relocates the critical and trip point handling to avoid a
> redundant temperature check.
>
> The series applies on top of 6.9-rc2 and I'm planning to create a test
> branch containing it.

As promised:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/log/?h=
=3Dthermal-core-testing