Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 18:03:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 18:03:03 -0500 Received: from fungus.teststation.com ([212.32.186.211]:37127 "EHLO fungus.teststation.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 18:02:57 -0500 Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 00:02:45 +0100 (CET) From: Urban Widmark X-X-Sender: To: Dan Kegel cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] smbfs fsx'ed In-Reply-To: <3C34E061.3455AE74@kegel.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Dan Kegel wrote: > I use smbfs to mount a visual sourcesafe database, > and run ss via wine. The combination is very slow. > Don't know how much of it is wine, and how much is smbfs, > but any speedup would be greatly appreciated. SS is really painful on a high latency connection, CVS is a wonder of efficiency in comparison. At least that is my experience. But that is probably not your setup. (and yes, I understood that you compared with windows performance) You may want to know that smbfs does not do any file locking. I don't know if SS depends on that or not. I do know that some people have tried running dos based database programs in dosemu accessing a database over smbfs with database corruption as a result. > (Eventually, wine will bundle its own smb code, but for > now if you want to access network shares, smbfs is the only way.) > - Dan > > p.s. see http://www.kegel.com/linux/vss-howto.html Very nice. The commandline SS client would never work for me under wine. I'll have to try that again. /Urban - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/