Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758536AbYATAcX (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:32:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752114AbYATAcO (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:32:14 -0500 Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.178]:5980 "EHLO py-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751785AbYATAcN (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:32:13 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=baep0ciql57XCmPyXWEi67DkSwPTRuKhpApToMPkbSXS3HHda8CriFUid+4W/QQ6/ZxNbr4LW/DjBHB5/mBJDHdOYBJPf7gaKjJDrWdiTr4Ye2u9MwAD8xiMrxiziC4hnpnCAfO1/XIQZeou2FSKn5mCI0tvHUoYnz9XNfPv5Eo= Message-ID: <524f69650801191632h71f340band275d8abfe7ad0f3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:32:11 -0600 From: "Steve French" To: "Andi Kleen" Subject: Re: [linux-cifs-client] [PATCH] Remove information leak in Linux CIFS clientg Cc: simo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs-client@lists.samba.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org In-Reply-To: <20080119232549.GA6275@one.firstfloor.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080119045552.GA11134@basil.nowhere.org> <1200730722.28706.70.camel@localhost.localdomain> <524f69650801191406j440e52afsb9b80efed4fa15da@mail.gmail.com> <20080119223029.GA5786@one.firstfloor.org> <524f69650801191455g5eab5edfw80f27136662a465c@mail.gmail.com> <20080119232549.GA6275@one.firstfloor.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2206 Lines: 53 Just merged into the cifs-2.6 tree, changing the last patch as you just suggested to take out the logged path name. On Jan 19, 2008 5:25 PM, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 04:55:53PM -0600, Steve French wrote: > > On Jan 19, 2008 4:30 PM, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 04:06:57PM -0600, Steve French wrote: > > > > The access denied message in the dmesg log reveals no more information > > > > than strace on stat of a local file does (which also returns access > > > > > > You can't strace a process you don't own. And you might not be able > > > to access the directory below which the file is. > > > > If you can't access the directory that the file is in then you get > > access denied on stat of the file (local over ext3 or remote over > > cifs) - it does not tell you anything about whether the file existed > > or not. If you do "stat > > /mnt/dir-with-0700-perm/file-which-does-not-exist" I get access > > denied. I don't think that it really tells you anything interesting > > since the same error comes back whether or not the file existed. > > The problem is that the file name ends up in the log for everybody to > read even if they're totally unrelated. So if someone in a protected directory > tree where they have access to does something that is denied the > file names will still leak to everybody else to the log. > > e.g. more concrete example. you do something and get that message. > > Now even 'nobody" running in a chroot will know that you tried > that and that at least parts of the file name likely exist. > > That is an information leak and imho a privacy problem. > > > Other unexpected errors (e.g. -EIO) should be logged because they > > indicate possibly severe problems with the network, but also don't > > tell you anything about whether the file exists. > > Sure errors should be logged, but not with path names. > > -Andi > -- Thanks, Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/