Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-129653-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
From: "Shreeya Patel" <shreeya.patel@collabora.com>
In-Reply-To: <a2f88176-b4e1-4202-843c-a00c5a2b1622@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
References: <20240327225057.672304-1-shreeya.patel@collabora.com>
 <35e566-660d2080-1-7eb9eb00@16488675> <a2f88176-b4e1-4202-843c-a00c5a2b1622@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 12:20:03 +0100
Cc: mchehab@kernel.org, hverkuil@xs4all.nl, hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl, heiko@sntech.de, robh@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org, p.zabel@pengutronix.de, shawn.wen@rock-chips.com, kernel@collabora.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm@lists.infradead.org
To: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <35f774-660d3b80-3-513fcf80@97941910>
Subject: =?utf-8?q?Re=3A?= [PATCH v3 0/6] Add Synopsys DesignWare HDMI RX Controller
User-Agent: SOGoMail 5.10.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wednesday, April 03, 2024 15:51 IST, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.=
kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:

> On 03/04/2024 11:24, Shreeya Patel wrote:
> > On Thursday, March 28, 2024 04:20 IST, Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel=
@collabora.com> wrote:
> >=20
> >> This series implements support for the Synopsys DesignWare
> >> HDMI RX Controller, being compliant with standard HDMI 1.4b
> >> and HDMI 2.0.
> >>
> >=20
> > Hi Mauro and Hans,
> >=20
> > I haven't received any reviews so far. Hence, this is just a gentle=
 reminder to review this patch series.
>=20
> Why did you put clk changes here? These go via different subsystem. T=
hat
> might be one of obstacles for your patchset.
>=20

I added clock changes in this patch series because HDMIRX driver depend=
s on it.
I thought it is wrong to send the driver patches which don't even compi=
le?

Since you are a more experienced developer, can you help me understand =
what would
be the right way to send patches in such scenarios?

Thanks,
Shreeya Patel

> Also, you sent it just a week ago and you already ping. Please relax,
> and help out by reviewing other patches on the mailing lists in order=
 to
> relieve the burden of maintainers and move your patches higher up the=
 list.
>=20
>=20
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>