Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-130167-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
From: Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
To: will@kernel.org,
	mark.rutland@arm.com,
	yury.norov@gmail.com,
	linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk
Cc: xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com,
	renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com,
	yangyicong@hisilicon.com,
	jonathan.cameron@huawei.com,
	andersson@kernel.org,
	konrad.dybcio@linaro.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
Subject: [PATCH v3 10/10] perf/thunderx2: Avoid placing cpumask on the stack
Date: Wed,  3 Apr 2024 23:59:50 +0800
Message-Id: <20240403155950.2068109-11-dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
In-Reply-To: <20240403155950.2068109-1-dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
References: <20240403155950.2068109-1-dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Feedback-ID: bizesmtp:shingroup.cn:qybglogicsvrgz:qybglogicsvrgz5a-1

In general it's preferable to avoid placing cpumasks on the stack, as
for large values of NR_CPUS these can consume significant amounts of
stack space and make stack overflows more likely.

Use cpumask_any_and_but() to avoid the need for a temporary cpumask on
the stack.

Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
---
 drivers/perf/thunderx2_pmu.c | 10 +++-------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/perf/thunderx2_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/thunderx2_pmu.c
index e16d10c763de..b3377b662ffc 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/thunderx2_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/thunderx2_pmu.c
@@ -932,9 +932,8 @@ static int tx2_uncore_pmu_online_cpu(unsigned int cpu,
 static int tx2_uncore_pmu_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu,
 		struct hlist_node *hpnode)
 {
-	int new_cpu;
 	struct tx2_uncore_pmu *tx2_pmu;
-	struct cpumask cpu_online_mask_temp;
+	unsigned int new_cpu;
 
 	tx2_pmu = hlist_entry_safe(hpnode,
 			struct tx2_uncore_pmu, hpnode);
@@ -945,11 +944,8 @@ static int tx2_uncore_pmu_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu,
 	if (tx2_pmu->hrtimer_callback)
 		hrtimer_cancel(&tx2_pmu->hrtimer);
 
-	cpumask_copy(&cpu_online_mask_temp, cpu_online_mask);
-	cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &cpu_online_mask_temp);
-	new_cpu = cpumask_any_and(
-			cpumask_of_node(tx2_pmu->node),
-			&cpu_online_mask_temp);
+	new_cpu = cpumask_any_and_but(cpumask_of_node(tx2_pmu->node),
+				      cpu_online_mask, cpu);
 
 	tx2_pmu->cpu = new_cpu;
 	if (new_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
-- 
2.27.0