Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-130162-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1;
From: Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
To: will@kernel.org,
	mark.rutland@arm.com,
	yury.norov@gmail.com,
	linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk
Cc: xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com,
	renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com,
	yangyicong@hisilicon.com,
	jonathan.cameron@huawei.com,
	andersson@kernel.org,
	konrad.dybcio@linaro.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
Subject: [PATCH v3 06/10] perf/dwc_pcie: Avoid placing cpumask on the stack
Date: Wed,  3 Apr 2024 23:59:46 +0800
Message-Id: <20240403155950.2068109-7-dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
In-Reply-To: <20240403155950.2068109-1-dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
References: <20240403155950.2068109-1-dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Feedback-ID: bizesmtp:shingroup.cn:qybglogicsvrgz:qybglogicsvrgz5a-1

In general it's preferable to avoid placing cpumasks on the stack, as
for large values of NR_CPUS these can consume significant amounts of
stack space and make stack overflows more likely.

Use cpumask_any_and_but() to avoid the need for a temporary cpumask on
the stack.

Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
---
 drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c | 10 ++++------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c
index 957058ad0099..c5e328f23841 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c
@@ -690,9 +690,8 @@ static int dwc_pcie_pmu_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *cpuhp_n
 {
 	struct dwc_pcie_pmu *pcie_pmu;
 	struct pci_dev *pdev;
-	int node;
-	cpumask_t mask;
 	unsigned int target;
+	int node;
 
 	pcie_pmu = hlist_entry_safe(cpuhp_node, struct dwc_pcie_pmu, cpuhp_node);
 	/* Nothing to do if this CPU doesn't own the PMU */
@@ -702,10 +701,9 @@ static int dwc_pcie_pmu_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *cpuhp_n
 	pcie_pmu->on_cpu = -1;
 	pdev = pcie_pmu->pdev;
 	node = dev_to_node(&pdev->dev);
-	if (cpumask_and(&mask, cpumask_of_node(node), cpu_online_mask) &&
-	    cpumask_andnot(&mask, &mask, cpumask_of(cpu)))
-		target = cpumask_any(&mask);
-	else
+
+	target = cpumask_any_and_but(cpumask_of_node(node), cpu_online_mask, cpu);
+	if (target >= nr_cpu_ids)
 		target = cpumask_any_but(cpu_online_mask, cpu);
 
 	if (target >= nr_cpu_ids) {
-- 
2.27.0