Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-130460-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 11:44:04 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf metrics: Remove the "No_group" metric group
Message-ID: <Zg2jdJ3-LNRkL95T@tassilo>
References: <20240403164636.3429091-1-irogers@google.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240403164636.3429091-1-irogers@google.com>

On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 09:46:36AM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> Rather than place metrics without a metric group in "No_group" place
> them in a a metric group that is their name. Still allow such metrics
> to be selected if "No_group" is passed, this change just impacts perf
> list.

But what's the point of it? It will just make perf list more verbose,
but I don't see any advantage.

-Andi