Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757623AbYAUCvT (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:51:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756094AbYAUCvI (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:51:08 -0500 Received: from pasmtpb.tele.dk ([80.160.77.98]:47642 "EHLO pasmtpB.tele.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753236AbYAUCvH (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:51:07 -0500 Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 03:51:11 +0100 From: Sam Ravnborg To: Adrian Bunk Cc: linux-kbuild , LKML , linux arch Subject: Re: kbuild: improved Section mismatch detection Message-ID: <20080121025111.GA26076@uranus.ravnborg.org> References: <20080120200527.GA23852@uranus.ravnborg.org> <20080120222754.GK8669@does.not.exist> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080120222754.GK8669@does.not.exist> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 795 Lines: 21 On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 12:27:54AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 09:05:27PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > >... > > Adrian reminded us that KCFLAGS=-fno-inline told > > another story with more than 100 Section mismatch > > warnings on 64 bit x86 with an allyesconfig build. > >... > > Not -fno-inline but -fno-inline-functions-called-once > (completely different option). Yep - looked that up after sending the mail. A quick test shows no diference in # of generated Section mismatch warnings for the two - which is good. Sam -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/