Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-130593-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 22:41:13 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Klara Modin <klarasmodin@gmail.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
	"Kaplan, David" <David.Kaplan@amd.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org" <linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] x86/retpoline: Ensure default return thunk isn't
 used at runtime
Message-ID: <20240403204113.GLZg2-6f0nH0Ne9CQt@fat_crate.local>
References: <20240104131210.GDZZauqoeKoZGpYwDd@fat_crate.local>
 <20240104132446.GEZZaxnrIgIyat0pqf@fat_crate.local>
 <20240104132623.GFZZax/wyf5Y3rMX5G@fat_crate.local>
 <20240207175010.nrr34b2pp3ewe3ga@treble>
 <20240207185328.GEZcPRqPsNInRXyNMj@fat_crate.local>
 <20240207194919.qw4jk2ykadjn5d4e@treble>
 <20240212104348.GCZcn2ZPr445KUyQ7k@fat_crate.local>
 <78e0d19c-b77a-4169-a80f-2eef91f4a1d6@gmail.com>
 <20240403173059.GJZg2SUwS8MXw7CdwF@fat_crate.local>
 <f37a111b-f5c5-4337-8eaf-46a2c28f01da@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <f37a111b-f5c5-4337-8eaf-46a2c28f01da@gmail.com>

On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 10:26:19PM +0200, Klara Modin wrote:
> Probably, I don't have much knowledge about this stuff. The machine can at
> least be useful for testing still :)

I wouldn't use it if I were you as it wouldn't even justify the
electricity wasted. No one cares about 32-bit x86 kernels anymore and we
barely keep them alive.

It'll be a lot more helpful if you'd test 64-bit kernels on 64-bit hw.

:-)

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette