Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-131124-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Message-ID: <535d994d8498daee40fda2d044cefeeda33ac38b.camel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] scsi: ufs: Remove support for old UFSHCI versions
From: Bean Huo <huobean@gmail.com>
To: Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>, "James E . J . Bottomley"
	 <jejb@linux.ibm.com>, "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Bart Van Assche
 <bvanassche@acm.org>,  Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>,
 linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 10:45:23 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20240327071714.757-2-avri.altman@wdc.com>
References: <20240327071714.757-1-avri.altman@wdc.com>
	 <20240327071714.757-2-avri.altman@wdc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Evolution 3.44.4-0ubuntu2 
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0

On Wed, 2024-03-27 at 09:17 +0200, Avri Altman wrote:
> UFS spec version 2.1 was published more than 10 years ago. It is
> vanishingly unlikely that even there are out there platforms that
> uses
> earlier host controllers, let alone that those ancient platforms will
> ever run a V6.10 kernel.=C2=A0 Thus, remove support of host controllers
> prior
> to UFS2.1.


>=20
> This patch removes some legacy tuning calls that no longer apply.
>=20
> Signed-off-by: Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>


Hi Avri,=20

I think it's safe to remove support for UFS versions < UFS 2.1, but not
100% sure, let me check and give you a solid answer then.

Bean