Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 21:31:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 21:31:32 -0500 Received: from zok.SGI.COM ([204.94.215.101]:38068 "EHLO zok.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 21:31:21 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 From: Keith Owens To: Andreas Bombe Cc: Alexander Viro , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: State of the new config & build system In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 04 Jan 2002 02:49:38 BST." <20020104014938.GA3474@storm.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2002 13:31:08 +1100 Message-ID: <24687.1010111468@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 4 Jan 2002 02:49:38 +0100, Andreas Bombe wrote: >Unionfs as I understand it would be great for editing/patching and >building. Build a kernel in the pristine sources, mount a COW layer >over it where you patch/edit, build there. In the ideal case the COW >layer would only build the changed file(s) and link vmlinux with all the >other objects from the pristine build. This wouldn't affect the >pristine build itself at all, no make problems there when you remove the >COW build&change layer. You are talking about removing an entire layer, I am talking about removing individual files when you decide the edit failed. Removing the entire layer works, as long as all changes are always made to the top layer. Removing individual files gets into timestamp problems. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/