Received: by 2002:ab2:7a55:0:b0:1f4:4a7d:290d with SMTP id u21csp342652lqp; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 15:16:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=3; AJvYcCU/gs6+bc0ulhUq+iV7bL9oFcroP/7DvTDEsfFV6yy7XavpZl6ympj8DQiHcO+HGepP5GOJKxy6zNa91TVsZKe0gQDUWA2vR6WUpnkevA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEfm5AyytL8JRo2nXExv7EAr9mKfO84WbkRdONC9srHqKUSpRLu3VOw+Ou/BmNXQXPihuKB X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:e604:b0:299:1777:134c with SMTP id j4-20020a17090ae60400b002991777134cmr3552979pjy.33.1712268961699; Thu, 04 Apr 2024 15:16:01 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1712268961; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=XSRpScXDLrZZhXiJ8fMHZfs1PPv0UegaCA4zdCZtDhr7OFB7+I7zQslGDaH16N9HIC sE1V4mshIyFY2/9dE7lqNko98Q4iriU706ydBE2Obkcl+TngTl2cC3ANRm/vgoMxkguz CR7qJqsQgNbUqLjMJUVpkr8dc5wETvhr1RwvPJg8WmWWDkgB3fg7AcxwX6dpRgV93sPZ AGaQenGsfWVxGgtO2WEnYJ1jLQozppeDM7BJT5bh3UQrgm0NX5wVUrBcKEaxbLoM8AEt pEg9UI4kRq2SbbZ2ynxaKTBTNWilotyKzEfeANwgSd4UjcBr+GTq3cit9kNfkr1wSYlm 0djQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=mime-version:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-id:precedence :references:message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date :feedback-id:dkim-signature; bh=2BjsJg1F1jsrIqkTlwXi7zvS9Quc1lTtGbFTjSTDfA4=; fh=UryJgbCfCqnUxigw/7XfXrmwp32s7HLrxjrD/yVDx90=; b=saAWr53mMJl9Gl+NpCTtDQhKg2s/BdhgRSlIEUqao8KOBIbWfea7dkBAUBnVDe5jNO c1gtGOmuSBuevatUi41UrHkBkOirOVq9JXaHovV73bNCyKpaBLCOjPvPhL1TCSUCPZ5V PmoH271fRj3y5VQQNDG3q8v+NeBHkovgzXlnbPY6vkTkzSyVWRWAaSunGYCCiRK9H9hD YfbDiauPXhQImjttxAlM8XCCNpRDjnaGvH21Z84RJ9BciDQC9zDvg/U4DAJFdzc3YPbO NsH9CkIxoo6luQR2HROCTCc88oXDVgzLol/RGsCnlflAwpEXNiRseSPUUBMj3l8sGBhw 9wPg==; dara=google.com ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=Jw1DfUkh; arc=pass (i=1 dkim=pass dkdomain=messagingengine.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-132187-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-132187-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org" Return-Path: Received: from sv.mirrors.kernel.org (sv.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:45e3:2400::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y5-20020a17090aa40500b002a04eef19a5si285129pjp.141.2024.04.04.15.16.01 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 04 Apr 2024 15:16:01 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-132187-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=Jw1DfUkh; arc=pass (i=1 dkim=pass dkdomain=messagingengine.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-132187-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-132187-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org" Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sv.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59AA0287E9F for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 22:16:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD9E613C3F2; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 22:15:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="Jw1DfUkh" Received: from fout6-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout6-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.149]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7E6C13C3DE; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 22:15:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.149 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712268955; cv=none; b=IoPg3KEXHRsqOwaxk7vTMrImxDdHCVWbqh4p538+ZPQ49W8ABXznQQdCVHP2eOBPvPR830PWiKt+THyWElHOExGN2wIRaccQyobg/BvmGzW/gmibXFgAA9rDrWT6CcltIY4GUvLMok5QNz873xVSFjx7afkKwVKRqsVBZYwFV7A= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712268955; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pTp5edkZdZb3eEOWCrTxXu87gsPr0RabVB3/ii9vNkw=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=QNL80t3Rk2hBjiwoPpdNuoEoE9j7aU75ZwA25mCwD3LjBW97CjrcyUhidBoV3kASyhdYkuJKsH8BfqNL9GGNhD+Y6sF087UqJY2t6JlVkGa06cPakYRfCxkYQH6LzWc8VSX2Oa3G1IPoY6QxDwAtBRgMchmGZIx8s8KPcLth8Z4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-m68k.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-m68k.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=Jw1DfUkh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.149 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-m68k.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-m68k.org Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailfout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCFB913800B8; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 18:15:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 04 Apr 2024 18:15:51 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; t=1712268951; x=1712355351; bh=2BjsJg1F1jsrIqkTlwXi7zvS9Quc 1lTtGbFTjSTDfA4=; b=Jw1DfUkhxICYlaH25P8sNWWfmviY9fTgQD1YAkM+b7J5 MLDoXeSGk6Ppi2vjNecFMnDMVAWH3cOI51tY25oyukCw05gCNvfiUFjjdFECZNKa m6kmayGHiHqRDj+AaubmnhfiCBKbgp2EmGoAOKgnyeAbKRBH5uvrTSwHI0OfjCwQ sZh1VGtktjiIk6Q4UAII8BrPseCAW5jBPLkOcHDgMsoDrbctl0ul4GLZPzSG5ny8 mmslf+tCky2hCQa0gvjwvW1FFj6Ec3CgKxiQvwc14ovTWKx/Vzmm0GWlRDGYB8L6 J2450RXPLz9cVmVP+dLv4twnNIQ7ApXzz/femDFrSA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrudefledgtdelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvfevufgjkfhfgggtsehttdertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefhihhnnhcu vfhhrghinhcuoehfthhhrghinheslhhinhhugidqmheikehkrdhorhhgqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpeelueehleehkefgueevtdevteejkefhffekfeffffdtgfejveekgeefvdeu heeuleenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpe hfthhhrghinheslhhinhhugidqmheikehkrdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i58a146ae:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 18:15:47 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 09:17:27 +1100 (AEDT) From: Finn Thain To: Andy Shevchenko cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Michael Ellerman , Nicholas Piggin , Christophe Leroy , "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , "Naveen N. Rao" , linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial/pmac_zilog: Remove flawed mitigation for rx irq flood In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <5dd285bd-b9a8-c85c-9bd9-a839c10e78fd@linux-m68k.org> References: <8f234f26-d5e3-66ed-ab0c-86d3c9852b4a@linux-m68k.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII On Thu, 4 Apr 2024, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > --- > > > (here is a good location for Cc:) > > > > Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst indicats that it should > > be above the "---" separator together with Acked-by etc. Has this > > convention changed recently? > > I see, I will prepare a patch to discuss this aspect. > If you are going to veto patches on the basis of rules yet unwritten, I think you risk turning the kernel development process into a lottery. How many other patches presently under review will need to be dropped just in case they don't conform with possible future rules?