Received: by 2002:ab2:1149:0:b0:1f3:1f8c:d0c6 with SMTP id z9csp2945760lqz; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 13:13:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCWQ+f+yGj6TzE6xr3Yb53rOgNMl8cOOBUgYyHVE26ca0xBnFEAcg1BaDPOei010NTWK95INW2p4fHxnNDQA0O4jiSKzz+QoTmxUMpz7iw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE6sAfBcjxol6owWA7/ksYo0JUQlAVVl3ArQ/psIPMT7TSAyWZJU7UchHYcCE6YuW71+WWY X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1a4f:b0:369:f185:4e06 with SMTP id u15-20020a056e021a4f00b00369f1854e06mr921928ilv.11.1712175209785; Wed, 03 Apr 2024 13:13:29 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from sy.mirrors.kernel.org (sy.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c28-20020a631c5c000000b005e438e9677fsi13216781pgm.616.2024.04.03.13.13.29 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 03 Apr 2024 13:13:29 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-130509-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@google.com header.s=20230601 header.b=Bf9yguDD; arc=fail (body hash mismatch); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-130509-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-130509-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=QUARANTINE) header.from=google.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sy.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFC7BB241F9 for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 19:35:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5D071514CF; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 19:35:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="Bf9yguDD" Received: from mail-wm1-f45.google.com (mail-wm1-f45.google.com [209.85.128.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46AA01552F8 for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 19:35:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.45 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712172920; cv=none; b=qHqBMpSnPoaYVyvcICdznTuE8V9FDkV2cEyfXC4ugBVGhQhDQcQyMDPTJp3WyQsx87cxA0uHtsnqCjRH7jtOdjSWTF9AoRBz5kMBZp48DKwDTu5zoKfaeNZQMgm1lzC20+N1e9jzQymjqOHuYKk055Jd2I1WgoreJbNFuZdMTaI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712172920; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Wz+XAmCjUc8PDsaYphxSsci9OJCLtebQHEYs8FmStqA=; h=MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=RyZM3DoX23BzCPxe2pgWA0SE5djJaJxfl2TFrqr/dzp1t2EUozYFI/wpByTd1aBdQwi14Q8DQ2B5f2BmlCrNcede2Uq8xUCn/wBsiHadbhqBAU7SugjT92Qxpg2VoqMiimUhppJaitQmri2NT4efeQdrXlWRP/6jGPvl8KOhT8I= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=Bf9yguDD; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.45 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=google.com Received: by mail-wm1-f45.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-413f8c8192eso21425e9.0 for ; Wed, 03 Apr 2024 12:35:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1712172917; x=1712777717; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=Wz+XAmCjUc8PDsaYphxSsci9OJCLtebQHEYs8FmStqA=; b=Bf9yguDDXSrI+aNRMNFLcLdKGpG2myuUFtGLECbxeLCXpHJvnMZi2S9citztBNOOFJ MDiaUinEQZZZv5uOtBB2gaOvgJ+XDcuk+B5Rq4s+BOlVVLMqvMDew8mKSpStNAjDwmiW 8wQMX6od3iJZ8VXCmgARiA4BwHcRExdNhmke6dUjnnEiIqqlhuHgDVhxCqhFGLIa8ETH EnPwwUzr3TIl5o4MBU65qKD3zzHltVFw8PiEfmrHeQ2r0Zxqo8cgQuksooJNBIlmms5Q jojbsGkunr1ibtn1oVX/vKYg8d1zG/Hdxubz0LNB/y88nutoLoo+t8H/dSgzsMqaXhCv f5lA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712172917; x=1712777717; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Wz+XAmCjUc8PDsaYphxSsci9OJCLtebQHEYs8FmStqA=; b=ghVt0D8y9qBp24s0rhiWXokTyoVEf8zkfkXWsxd+TGCjzmjFdy9f0L0oxn4ipuJqK4 slICXvKeMak4lbmccMbiJvRedW0LnqITIk3sgiWkJyJsk1fY63lrDT9yRof/7s4/buAg ot8g8UtbpIMuKHixWBA7cqlxxuibA0sByBAa2DXaU75gtQXhOSlSWu7B2FuZQ49dMXJb DFL9Wq1DG31NSDT1iAFieEwe9S5hKJwJLo+PTYYLVP03OcllSKn5tQEc0Gm5drFhZzDr 6dYE9Gu3nyWI4ZXLasRoF0UvemlbYxdZvhP7M9ai/Y1bOThucbLFTD2iQuXP3a1lHLTA YwFQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXkrBcjeRXOYEpSOVv9QY0qqGH09xt9CEtcbcRwlIPAL1k5gcqaDWJcKGoqGmIoC4prFdzZ55oqQmmkBG9bNFL4hv2nXz2y+Z/NR5oB X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw1xcougkcGrP3t0T1CJjnBQf4l3Tmyav39ZHClczi/HRz9yfNQ bjM1lYOQWNc9KfkMjhYXg71700tjokDiYd8HcQi/ksxUrbH0VRjCgkhD5NSgR9218WqsUvoy/T9 gWxc9Z2u+lR82wTan99SiI5z9uXVUy5+eE7I= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1d25:b0:416:1eba:175f with SMTP id l37-20020a05600c1d2500b004161eba175fmr299989wms.6.1712172917250; Wed, 03 Apr 2024 12:35:17 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87sf02bgez.ffs@tglx> <87r0fmbe65.ffs@tglx> <87o7aqb6uw.ffs@tglx> In-Reply-To: <87o7aqb6uw.ffs@tglx> From: John Stultz Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 12:35:04 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] posix-timers: Prefer delivery of signals to the current thread To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Oleg Nesterov , Marco Elver , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , "Eric W. Biederman" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Dmitry Vyukov , kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, Edward Liaw , Carlos Llamas , Greg Kroah-Hartman Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 12:10=E2=80=AFPM Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 03 2024 at 11:16, John Stultz wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 9:32=E2=80=AFAM Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > Thanks for this, Thomas! > > > > Just FYI: testing with 6.1, the test no longer hangs, but I don't see > > the SKIP behavior. It just fails: > > not ok 6 check signal distribution > > # Totals: pass:5 fail:1 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0 > > > > I've not had time yet to dig into what's going on, but let me know if > > you need any further details. > > That's weird. I ran it on my laptop with 6.1.y ... > > What kind of machine is that? I was running it in a VM. Interestingly with 64cpus it sometimes will do the skip behavior, but with 4 cpus it seems to always fail. thanks -john