Received: by 2002:ab2:7a55:0:b0:1f4:4a7d:290d with SMTP id u21csp519288lqp; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 00:06:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCV5TgbiBO8FjqjMU/bES3dynOD9+yHxYhUv8a3KPstzW3gMFoRW0PunwTk/MOlT68MuHx4hdjT00rFwK7nKNuUvF6wAE4KAxfc5fdf0eg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH1RbRvFP/xcFh9B0LvSD+4EfnGO8mEK+Bip7S7+VkjVmXfAVerSiPgNuFTwwWML74Mrzi8 X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:1206:b0:1e2:9205:5254 with SMTP id l6-20020a170903120600b001e292055254mr785331plh.7.1712300760813; Fri, 05 Apr 2024 00:06:00 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from sv.mirrors.kernel.org (sv.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:45e3:2400::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h2-20020a170902f54200b001e11b979048si859158plf.306.2024.04.05.00.06.00 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 05 Apr 2024 00:06:00 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-132500-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=NjFqhPXC; arc=fail (body hash mismatch); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-132500-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-132500-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sv.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DD2F28BD1F for ; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 06:54:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 137AA286A6; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 06:53:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="NjFqhPXC" Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 475EF224CE for ; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 06:53:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712300037; cv=none; b=QLHxZsCxFm+FsiOwhFw5nuo9wH+554pJS+r2chFH3lMwr3WJD04DdfPxxfnJn1kp/ldNLtwkNmAwwNqBNMY9Tc1yu4+3SYFkaKuVPRfot+ugVOCFQB9JgSgDnRCeKTvP1oJD1+0bo3TfgqmOylD8R45fJ71lbDRkll2v85OvJI0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712300037; c=relaxed/simple; bh=a1uI/EpIR4gkdjWK0FYsnrP/u3Er++3KeiVO8G0aeGo=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=AlL9EZo7JBysCQEDPg0yAki3EqE5c9e8PP1AxOd4sh3r1Ynx443qZGhhk1zVoUbE23tb0mOm09vGcMhdrgEbTVSwXw8TzlaQWExDiG355NxRwUUX1fDZmmSPVYQoVmQ6eVsNZ3zTAuB1lgUUvSjVt2LjhmtnpqhhU2xfoEoDcss= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=NjFqhPXC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1712300034; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=NFXw0uXPa1e5iAn6t3w1lZoilH1G/Z4MsITH9Yy0Mbs=; b=NjFqhPXCNCte3FbaP1ql2Ioo5OSloEW1LiLzckfAPcUKQ/7W6Bg/Nz8KjbCjgp4QgTic2d 4XTDkwtlNb5E9/T4G/3xwZvfY7GDVoyZJTfY54Vob3prwuuhAh85BjMnYqc43vtocjn7Zj RfgefEHgLbfkA+0Bxyx3YWC+II08ujk= Received: from mail-wr1-f69.google.com (mail-wr1-f69.google.com [209.85.221.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-590-rSQJX11-NvmZnowWEx-cfA-1; Fri, 05 Apr 2024 02:53:52 -0400 X-MC-Unique: rSQJX11-NvmZnowWEx-cfA-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f69.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-343bb240f70so698815f8f.1 for ; Thu, 04 Apr 2024 23:53:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712300031; x=1712904831; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:organization:autocrypt:from :content-language:references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=NFXw0uXPa1e5iAn6t3w1lZoilH1G/Z4MsITH9Yy0Mbs=; b=tI2MfinS1kNP4umHwb/oweRad0xR5Umw6BS8i9GXQbjaU+lDbHKsN0fSBbKq/IJg9s Tj1NuZJmi3gzAEM/JfZUvwtXvBFGulTKtlbj6PK6699yi77NIOAoKD0/35xSBZJ5Ev66 Xb2ZBy+iy3ZuMCWA8U9G3PdXjQwEQmfh+reo2wjNvhU+Q4ZInsnXZyTbsTY/hPVzcKyi 44Q2pet5/u8kMsDgGLxM9BT0/mhiDR6qv/LP29ErQy9SxoJZbRJDkESVj09mVCa0Rmc9 MyiM0kPj0UOaYEM0nZIG0QoIqiS5DmWlHmM0pviiHu2z6Y3XIDTrQTaI6DXk3h3vi9YA NK3Q== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUCqMEUMwS3+FUxqMtfFXWWsZx6S0SgceAvPZVPcAABxFCbVDDG6DXJM2XKaxSNZoLpxV5PY8O2Wp54HIHdmpjDBx31dJCKVsIT9CrW X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzrjTsH71b3ETYE566REd59D8R7Q1d1i2RqmkPxYTU10WTymqwo 63qvNjdgex8YpxYhDQhL5KT5Y8dSC9UDx3l+nh3tFw0e/D5BrhkHGUib6j5qopvFb4yyr6ediUz WHt5ftyY+PAXdkfyxT7r7lUASYhbblNSsBOruEPcFwOJwQSzozVmaz/S5IqSOlw== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4705:0:b0:343:7f4b:6da5 with SMTP id y5-20020a5d4705000000b003437f4b6da5mr1302724wrq.17.1712300031645; Thu, 04 Apr 2024 23:53:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4705:0:b0:343:7f4b:6da5 with SMTP id y5-20020a5d4705000000b003437f4b6da5mr1302708wrq.17.1712300031263; Thu, 04 Apr 2024 23:53:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2003:cb:c74b:5500:e1f8:a310:8fa3:4ec1? (p200300cbc74b5500e1f8a3108fa34ec1.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:cb:c74b:5500:e1f8:a310:8fa3:4ec1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a17-20020a5d5091000000b00341ba91c1f5sm1220508wrt.102.2024.04.04.23.53.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 04 Apr 2024 23:53:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <36e1592a-e590-48a0-9a79-eeac6b41314b@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 08:53:49 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Rework marking folios dirty/accessed To: Sean Christopherson Cc: David Matlack , Paolo Bonzini , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Stevens , Matthew Wilcox References: <20240320005024.3216282-1-seanjc@google.com> <4d04b010-98f3-4eae-b320-a7dd6104b0bf@redhat.com> <42dbf562-5eab-4f82-ad77-5ee5b8c79285@redhat.com> Content-Language: en-US From: David Hildenbrand Autocrypt: addr=david@redhat.com; keydata= xsFNBFXLn5EBEAC+zYvAFJxCBY9Tr1xZgcESmxVNI/0ffzE/ZQOiHJl6mGkmA1R7/uUpiCjJ dBrn+lhhOYjjNefFQou6478faXE6o2AhmebqT4KiQoUQFV4R7y1KMEKoSyy8hQaK1umALTdL QZLQMzNE74ap+GDK0wnacPQFpcG1AE9RMq3aeErY5tujekBS32jfC/7AnH7I0v1v1TbbK3Gp XNeiN4QroO+5qaSr0ID2sz5jtBLRb15RMre27E1ImpaIv2Jw8NJgW0k/D1RyKCwaTsgRdwuK Kx/Y91XuSBdz0uOyU/S8kM1+ag0wvsGlpBVxRR/xw/E8M7TEwuCZQArqqTCmkG6HGcXFT0V9 PXFNNgV5jXMQRwU0O/ztJIQqsE5LsUomE//bLwzj9IVsaQpKDqW6TAPjcdBDPLHvriq7kGjt WhVhdl0qEYB8lkBEU7V2Yb+SYhmhpDrti9Fq1EsmhiHSkxJcGREoMK/63r9WLZYI3+4W2rAc UucZa4OT27U5ZISjNg3Ev0rxU5UH2/pT4wJCfxwocmqaRr6UYmrtZmND89X0KigoFD/XSeVv jwBRNjPAubK9/k5NoRrYqztM9W6sJqrH8+UWZ1Idd/DdmogJh0gNC0+N42Za9yBRURfIdKSb B3JfpUqcWwE7vUaYrHG1nw54pLUoPG6sAA7Mehl3nd4pZUALHwARAQABzSREYXZpZCBIaWxk ZW5icmFuZCA8ZGF2aWRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbT7CwZgEEwEIAEICGwMGCwkIBwMCBhUIAgkKCwQW AgMBAh4BAheAAhkBFiEEG9nKrXNcTDpGDfzKTd4Q9wD/g1oFAl8Ox4kFCRKpKXgACgkQTd4Q 9wD/g1oHcA//a6Tj7SBNjFNM1iNhWUo1lxAja0lpSodSnB2g4FCZ4R61SBR4l/psBL73xktp rDHrx4aSpwkRP6Epu6mLvhlfjmkRG4OynJ5HG1gfv7RJJfnUdUM1z5kdS8JBrOhMJS2c/gPf wv1TGRq2XdMPnfY2o0CxRqpcLkx4vBODvJGl2mQyJF/gPepdDfcT8/PY9BJ7FL6Hrq1gnAo4 3Iv9qV0JiT2wmZciNyYQhmA1V6dyTRiQ4YAc31zOo2IM+xisPzeSHgw3ONY/XhYvfZ9r7W1l pNQdc2G+o4Di9NPFHQQhDw3YTRR1opJaTlRDzxYxzU6ZnUUBghxt9cwUWTpfCktkMZiPSDGd KgQBjnweV2jw9UOTxjb4LXqDjmSNkjDdQUOU69jGMUXgihvo4zhYcMX8F5gWdRtMR7DzW/YE BgVcyxNkMIXoY1aYj6npHYiNQesQlqjU6azjbH70/SXKM5tNRplgW8TNprMDuntdvV9wNkFs 9TyM02V5aWxFfI42+aivc4KEw69SE9KXwC7FSf5wXzuTot97N9Phj/Z3+jx443jo2NR34XgF 89cct7wJMjOF7bBefo0fPPZQuIma0Zym71cP61OP/i11ahNye6HGKfxGCOcs5wW9kRQEk8P9 M/k2wt3mt/fCQnuP/mWutNPt95w9wSsUyATLmtNrwccz63XOwU0EVcufkQEQAOfX3n0g0fZz Bgm/S2zF/kxQKCEKP8ID+Vz8sy2GpDvveBq4H2Y34XWsT1zLJdvqPI4af4ZSMxuerWjXbVWb T6d4odQIG0fKx4F8NccDqbgHeZRNajXeeJ3R7gAzvWvQNLz4piHrO/B4tf8svmRBL0ZB5P5A 2uhdwLU3NZuK22zpNn4is87BPWF8HhY0L5fafgDMOqnf4guJVJPYNPhUFzXUbPqOKOkL8ojk CXxkOFHAbjstSK5Ca3fKquY3rdX3DNo+EL7FvAiw1mUtS+5GeYE+RMnDCsVFm/C7kY8c2d0G NWkB9pJM5+mnIoFNxy7YBcldYATVeOHoY4LyaUWNnAvFYWp08dHWfZo9WCiJMuTfgtH9tc75 7QanMVdPt6fDK8UUXIBLQ2TWr/sQKE9xtFuEmoQGlE1l6bGaDnnMLcYu+Asp3kDT0w4zYGsx 5r6XQVRH4+5N6eHZiaeYtFOujp5n+pjBaQK7wUUjDilPQ5QMzIuCL4YjVoylWiBNknvQWBXS lQCWmavOT9sttGQXdPCC5ynI+1ymZC1ORZKANLnRAb0NH/UCzcsstw2TAkFnMEbo9Zu9w7Kv AxBQXWeXhJI9XQssfrf4Gusdqx8nPEpfOqCtbbwJMATbHyqLt7/oz/5deGuwxgb65pWIzufa N7eop7uh+6bezi+rugUI+w6DABEBAAHCwXwEGAEIACYCGwwWIQQb2cqtc1xMOkYN/MpN3hD3 AP+DWgUCXw7HsgUJEqkpoQAKCRBN3hD3AP+DWrrpD/4qS3dyVRxDcDHIlmguXjC1Q5tZTwNB boaBTPHSy/Nksu0eY7x6HfQJ3xajVH32Ms6t1trDQmPx2iP5+7iDsb7OKAb5eOS8h+BEBDeq 3ecsQDv0fFJOA9ag5O3LLNk+3x3q7e0uo06XMaY7UHS341ozXUUI7wC7iKfoUTv03iO9El5f XpNMx/YrIMduZ2+nd9Di7o5+KIwlb2mAB9sTNHdMrXesX8eBL6T9b+MZJk+mZuPxKNVfEQMQ a5SxUEADIPQTPNvBewdeI80yeOCrN+Zzwy/Mrx9EPeu59Y5vSJOx/z6OUImD/GhX7Xvkt3kq Er5KTrJz3++B6SH9pum9PuoE/k+nntJkNMmQpR4MCBaV/J9gIOPGodDKnjdng+mXliF3Ptu6 3oxc2RCyGzTlxyMwuc2U5Q7KtUNTdDe8T0uE+9b8BLMVQDDfJjqY0VVqSUwImzTDLX9S4g/8 kC4HRcclk8hpyhY2jKGluZO0awwTIMgVEzmTyBphDg/Gx7dZU1Xf8HFuE+UZ5UDHDTnwgv7E th6RC9+WrhDNspZ9fJjKWRbveQgUFCpe1sa77LAw+XFrKmBHXp9ZVIe90RMe2tRL06BGiRZr jPrnvUsUUsjRoRNJjKKA/REq+sAnhkNPPZ/NNMjaZ5b8Tovi8C0tmxiCHaQYqj7G2rgnT0kt WNyWQQ== Organization: Red Hat In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05.04.24 00:02, Sean Christopherson wrote: > On Thu, Apr 04, 2024, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> On 04.04.24 19:31, Sean Christopherson wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 04, 2024, David Hildenbrand wrote: >>>> On 04.04.24 00:19, Sean Christopherson wrote: >>>>> Hmm, we essentially already have an mmu_notifier today, since secondary MMUs need >>>>> to be invalidated before consuming dirty status. Isn't the end result essentially >>>>> a sane FOLL_TOUCH? >>>> >>>> Likely. As stated in my first mail, FOLL_TOUCH is a bit of a mess right now. >>>> >>>> Having something that makes sure the writable PTE/PMD is dirty (or >>>> alternatively sets it dirty), paired with MMU notifiers notifying on any >>>> mkclean would be one option that would leave handling how to handle dirtying >>>> of folios completely to the core. It would behave just like a CPU writing to >>>> the page table, which would set the pte dirty. >>>> >>>> Of course, if frequent clearing of the dirty PTE/PMD bit would be a problem >>>> (like we discussed for the accessed bit), that would not be an option. But >>>> from what I recall, only clearing the PTE/PMD dirty bit is rather rare. >>> >>> And AFAICT, all cases already invalidate secondary MMUs anyways, so if anything >>> it would probably be a net positive, e.g. the notification could more precisely >>> say that SPTEs need to be read-only, not blasted away completely. >> >> As discussed, I think at least madvise_free_pte_range() wouldn't do that. > > I'm getting a bit turned around. Are you talking about what madvise_free_pte_range() > would do in this future world, or what madvise_free_pte_range() does today? Because > today, unless I'm really misreading the code, secondary MMUs are invalidated before > the dirty bit is cleared. Likely I missed it, sorry! I was talking about the possible future. :) > > mmu_notifier_range_init(&range, MMU_NOTIFY_CLEAR, 0, mm, > range.start, range.end); > > lru_add_drain(); > tlb_gather_mmu(&tlb, mm); > update_hiwater_rss(mm); > > mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range); > tlb_start_vma(&tlb, vma); > walk_page_range(vma->vm_mm, range.start, range.end, > &madvise_free_walk_ops, &tlb); > tlb_end_vma(&tlb, vma); > mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(&range); > Indeed, we do setup the MMU notifier invalidation. We do the start/end .. I was looking for PTE notifications. I spotted the set_pte_at(), not a set_pte_at_notify() like we do in other code. Maybe that's not required here (digging through documentation I'm still left clueless). " set_pte_at_notify() sets the pte _after_ running the notifier. This is safe to start by updating the secondary MMUs, because the primary MMU pte invalidate must have already happened with a ptep_clear_flush() before set_pte_at_notify() has been invoked. ... " Absolutely unclear to me when we *must* to use it, or if it is. Likely its a pure optimization when we're *changing* a PTE. KSM and wp_page_copy() uses it with MMU_NOTIFY_CLEAR, when replacing the mapped page by another page (or write-protecting an existing one). __replace_page() uses it with __replace_page() when replacing the mapped page. And migrate_vma_insert_page() uses it with MMU_NOTIFY_MIGRATE. Other code (e.g., khugepaged) doesn't seem to use it as well. .. so I guess it's fine? Confusing. -- Cheers, David / dhildenb