Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-133075-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 15:35:55 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Eric Hagberg <ehagberg@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Russ Anderson <rja@hpe.com>,
	Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@hpe.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
	Pavin Joseph <me@pavinjoseph.com>, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
	Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>, Sarah Brofeldt <srhb@dbc.dk>,
	Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@hpe.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm/ident_map: Use full gbpages in identity maps
 except on UV platform.
Message-ID: <2024040543-enticing-ferris-2fb5@gregkh>
References: <20240322162135.3984233-1-steve.wahl@hpe.com>
 <ZgABC1oQ9YJW6Bw3@gmail.com>
 <20240325020334.GA10309@hpe.com>
 <ZgFY24QT7470ZGnV@gmail.com>
 <CAJbxNHeqY3QevjH3=BuD=DhB0YK6ZvPDbOn_m-LOYAfY81MqhA@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CAJbxNHeqY3QevjH3=BuD=DhB0YK6ZvPDbOn_m-LOYAfY81MqhA@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 09:13:36AM -0400, Eric Hagberg wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 6:58 AM Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> > Anyway, I've reverted this in tip:x86/urgent:
> >
> >   c567f2948f57 Revert "x86/mm/ident_map: Use gbpages only where full GB page should be mapped."
> 
> I see that this hasn't been reverted in the longterm branches it made
> it into already (6.1.x and 6.6.x, for example) - is it expected to be
> reverted there as well? I'd think it should be, until this is all
> sorted out.
> 

The revert is queued up for the next round of stable updates.

thanks,

greg k-h