Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-133884-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2024 11:02:59 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@gmail.com>
Cc: lars@metafoo.de, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
 ang.iglesiasg@gmail.com, mazziesaccount@gmail.com, ak@it-klinger.de,
 petre.rodan@subdimension.ro, phil@raspberrypi.com, 579lpy@gmail.com,
 linus.walleij@linaro.org, semen.protsenko@linaro.org,
 linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] iio: pressure: Add triggered buffer support for
 BMP280 driver
Message-ID: <20240406110259.572a3f25@jic23-huawei>
In-Reply-To: <20240402180849.GB18068@vamoiridPC>
References: <20240319002925.2121016-1-vassilisamir@gmail.com>
	<20240319002925.2121016-7-vassilisamir@gmail.com>
	<20240324121418.570857a9@jic23-huawei>
	<20240402180849.GB18068@vamoiridPC>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


> > >  
> > > +static irqreturn_t bmp280_buffer_handler(int irq, void *p)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct iio_poll_func *pf = p;
> > > +	struct iio_dev *indio_dev = pf->indio_dev;
> > > +	struct bmp280_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > > +	s32 adc_temp, adc_press, adc_humidity;
> > > +	u8 size_of_burst_read;
> > > +	int ret, chan_value;
> > > +
> > > +	guard(mutex)(&data->lock);
> > > +
> > > +	if (test_bit(BME280_HUMID, indio_dev->active_scan_mask))  
> > 
> > This confuses me a little. Is it allowing reuse of this function for
> > multiple devices or aiming to optimise the read in the case of
> > the humidity channel being disabled (in which case I don't think
> > it works because you aren't providing that combination in avail_scan_masks.)
> > 
> > Add a comment to explain.
> >   
> 
> Hi Jonathan,
> 
> It is aimed to reuse the function both for BMP280 and BME280 so that's why is
> there, it's not in case humidity channel is disabled. I can add a comment it
> is definitely not obvious. Thanks for pointing this out.
> 
> By applying the changes that you pointed out + by implementing the changes
> that you proposed in a previous patch to split the t_fine calculation this
> patch will become much cleaner, thanks a lot!

A comment would do the job nicely. Thanks,

J