DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=T+blziCPFUzG3U5uaDEBe+atdrvPKYJDA60neUfHQJw39aQ4WIdB75wIKNXPS5mmvyqUml+RwtCVipCAsIo6WP9trngVi7nhjSUMkj2SX6iNLsd0Vbm9Qmsz1lRioiV1h6OpCyn8tVszxoktQKR/cZslUAge0jeO5+eyI1ervoE=
Message-ID: <4df4ef0c0801211740i168a82e6ha8992710da81f0b1@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:40:52 +0300
From: "Anton Salikhmetov" <salikhmetov@gmail.com>
To: "Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v7 0/2] Fixing the issue with memory-mapped file times
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, jakob@unthought.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu, riel@redhat.com, ksm@42.dk,
       staubach@redhat.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
       a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, akpm@linux-foundation.org, protasnb@gmail.com,
       miklos@szeredi.hu, r.e.wolff@bitwizard.nl, hidave.darkstar@gmail.com,
       hch@infradead.org
In-Reply-To: <9a8748490801211734w7fbb0ed9i66d63153c870a3f0@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <12009619562023-git-send-email-salikhmetov@gmail.com>
	 <9a8748490801211734w7fbb0ed9i66d63153c870a3f0@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 2068
Lines: 49

2008/1/22, Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>:
> On 22/01/2008, Anton Salikhmetov <salikhmetov@gmail.com> wrote:
> > This is the seventh version of my solution for the bug #2645:
> >
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2645
> >
> > Since the previous version, the following has changed: based on
> > Linus' comment, SMP-safe PTE update implemented.
> >
> > Discussions, which followed my past submissions, showed that it was
> > tempting to approach this problem using very different assumptions.
> > However, many such designs have proved to be incomplete or inefficient.
> >
> > Taking into account the obvious complexity of this problem, I prepared a
> > design document, the purpose of which is twofold. First, it summarizes
> > previous attempts to resolve the ctime/mtime issue. Second, it attempts
> > to prove that what the patches do is necessary and sufficient for mtime
> > and ctime update provided that we start from a certain sane set of
> > requirements. The design document is available via the following link:
> >
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2645#c40
> >
> > For the seventh version, comprehensive performance testing was performed.
> > The results of performance tests, including numbers, are available here:
> >
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2645#c43
> >
>
> Hi Anton,
>
> I applied your patches here and as far as my own test programs go,
> these patches solve the previously observed problems I saw with mtime
> not getting updated.
>
> Thank you very much for so persistently working on these long standing issues.

Thank you very much for testing these patches!

>
> --
> Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
> Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
> Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/