Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-134228-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1;
Message-ID: <4d231dc4-0183-47e1-8bfa-3dd225bf8ea3@leemhuis.info>
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2024 09:47:00 +0200
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Fwd: Steam Deck OLED 6.8.2 nau8821-max fails
To: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>,
 Venkata Prasad Potturu <venkataprasad.potturu@amd.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
 Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
 Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com>,
 Emil Velikov <emil.velikov@collabora.com>,
 Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>,
 Arun Gopal Kondaveeti <arungopal.kondaveeti@amd.com>,
 Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>,
 Daniel <dmanlfc@gmail.com>,
 Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
 Linux Regressions <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
 Linux Sound System <linux-sound@vger.kernel.org>
References: <ZhFJZoful6nEFskW@archie.me>
From: "Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)"
 <regressions@leemhuis.info>
Content-Language: en-US, de-DE
Reply-To: Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>
In-Reply-To: <ZhFJZoful6nEFskW@archie.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 06.04.24 15:08, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> 
> On Bugzilla, Daniel <dmanlfc@gmail.com> reported topology regression
> on Steam Deck OLED [1]. He wrote:

Bagas, why didn't you forward this to me in private first, as we agreed
on as general procedure for cases like this?

Anyway:

>> I'm adding this here, I hope it's the correct place.
>>
>> Currently the Steam Deck OLED fails with Kernel 6.8.2 when trying to initialise the topology for the device.
>> I'm using the `sof-vangogh-nau8821-max.tplg` file from the Steam Deck OLED and associated firmware.
> 
> See Bugzilla for the full thread.
> 
> [1]: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218677

A quick search made me find these posts/threads that foreshadow the problem:

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231219030728.2431640-1-cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/all/a3357e1f-f354-4d4b-9751-6b2182dceea6@amd.com/

From a quick look at the second discussion it seems a bit like we are
screwed, as iiutc topology files are out in the wild for one or the
other approach. So we might have to bite a bullet there and accept the
regression -- but I might easily be totally mistaken here. Would be good
in one of the experts (Venkata Prasad Potturu maybe?) could quickly
explain what's up here.

Ciao, Thorsten