Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 03:03:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 03:02:53 -0500 Received: from smtp1.vol.cz ([195.250.128.73]:3859 "EHLO smtp1.vol.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 03:02:42 -0500 Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 23:40:46 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Richard Henderson , Tom Rini , Momchil Velikov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org, Franz Sirl , Paul Mackerras , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Corey Minyard Subject: Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Message-ID: <20020103234046.B12380@elf.ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: <87g05py8qq.fsf@fadata.bg> <20020102190910.GG1803@cpe-24-221-152-185.az.sprintbbd.net> <20020102133632.C10362@redhat.com> <20020102220548.GL1803@cpe-24-221-152-185.az.sprintbbd.net> <20020102142712.B10474@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020102142712.B10474@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > Well, the problem is that we aren't running where the compiler thinks we > > are yet. So what would the right fix be for this? > > Assembly. Is there problem with doing what Jakub suggested? Pavel -- (about SSSCA) "I don't say this lightly. However, I really think that the U.S. no longer is classifiable as a democracy, but rather as a plutocracy." --hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/