Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-134866-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Message-ID: <9cce197b-bbdc-4003-898e-11d736497c1d@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 14:58:27 +0800
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/14] mm/ksm: use folio in write_protect_page
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, alexs@kernel.org,
 Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>, Andrea Arcangeli
 <aarcange@redhat.com>, Izik Eidus <izik.eidus@ravellosystems.com>,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ryncsn@gmail.com
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
References: <20240325124904.398913-1-alexs@kernel.org>
 <20240325124904.398913-8-alexs@kernel.org>
 <e16806b0-7c17-4356-8b47-30f624756e85@redhat.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Alex Shi <seakeel@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <e16806b0-7c17-4356-8b47-30f624756e85@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit


On 4/5/24 3:23 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 25.03.24 13:48, alexs@kernel.org wrote:
>> From: "Alex Shi (tencent)" <alexs@kernel.org>
>>
>> Compound page is checked and skipped before write_protect_page() called,
>> use folio to save a few compound_head checking.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi (tencent) <alexs@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Izik Eidus <izik.eidus@ravellosystems.com>
>> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
>> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
>> Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
>> ---
>>   mm/ksm.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
>>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/ksm.c b/mm/ksm.c
>> index 95a487a21eed..5d1f62e7462a 100644
>> --- a/mm/ksm.c
>> +++ b/mm/ksm.c
>> @@ -1289,22 +1289,22 @@ static u32 calc_checksum(struct page *page)
>>       return checksum;
>>   }
>>   -static int write_protect_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct page *page,
>> +static int write_protect_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct folio *folio,
>>                     pte_t *orig_pte)
>>   {
>>       struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
>> -    DEFINE_PAGE_VMA_WALK(pvmw, page, vma, 0, 0);
>> +    DEFINE_FOLIO_VMA_WALK(pvmw, folio, vma, 0, 0);
>>       int swapped;
>>       int err = -EFAULT;
>>       struct mmu_notifier_range range;
>>       bool anon_exclusive;
>>       pte_t entry;
>>   -    pvmw.address = page_address_in_vma(page, vma);
>> +    pvmw.address = page_address_in_vma(&folio->page, vma);
>>       if (pvmw.address == -EFAULT)
>>           goto out;
>>   -    BUG_ON(PageTransCompound(page));
>> +    VM_BUG_ON(folio_test_large(folio));
> 
> I suggest
> 
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(folio_test_large(folio)))
>     return err;
> 
> before the page_address_in_vma() call.
> 

Thanks for the suggestion, will take it.

> 
> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>