Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755152AbYAVMWE (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:22:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751906AbYAVMVy (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:21:54 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:54941 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751560AbYAVMVx (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:21:53 -0500 Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:20:58 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Glauber de Oliveira Costa Cc: Zachary Amsden , Glauber de Oliveira Costa , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de, ehabkost@redhat.com, jeremy@goop.org, avi@qumranet.com, anthony@codemonkey.ws, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, ak@suse.de, chrisw@sous-sol.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, hpa@zytor.com, roland@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/10] Tree fixes for PARAVIRT Message-ID: <20080122122058.GC31253@elte.hu> References: <12006768251548-git-send-email-gcosta@redhat.com> <20080118203259.GA3079@elte.hu> <20080118213711.GA24979@elte.hu> <1200693248.21817.157.camel@bodhitayantram.eng.vmware.com> <20080118220200.GA1071@elte.hu> <5d6222a80801181724p40bdedebgded1d43b052d168e@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5d6222a80801181724p40bdedebgded1d43b052d168e@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1375 Lines: 37 * Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote: > On Jan 18, 2008 8:02 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Zachary Amsden wrote: > > > > > > but in exchange you broke all of 32-bit with CONFIG_PARAVIRT=y. > > > > Which means you did not even build-test it on 32-bit, let alone boot > > > > test it... > > > > > > Why are we rushing so much to do 64-bit paravirt that we are breaking > > > working configurations? If the developement is going to be this > > > chaotic, it should be done and tested out of tree until it can > > > stabilize. > > > > what you see is a open feedback cycle conducted on lkml. People send > > patches for arch/x86, and we tell them if it breaks something. The bug > > was found before i pushed out the x86.git devel tree (and the fix is > > below - but this shouldnt matter to you because the bug never hit a > > public x86.git tree). > > > > Ingo > > > Other than this, it seems to build and boot fine. > > Do you want me to resend ? no, this was the only small problem i found, your series looks good to me and is included in latest x86.git. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/