Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-136379-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Sender: Ingo Molnar <mingo.kernel.org@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 09:40:29 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET 0/9] Sync tools headers with the kernel source
Message-ID: <ZhTw7e+sy0wfzgR5@gmail.com>
References: <20240408185520.1550865-1-namhyung@kernel.org>
 <ZhRB4BULj1Y1f1TN@x1>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZhRB4BULj1Y1f1TN@x1>


* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 11:55:11AM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I'm gonna carry these changes on the perf tools tree.  I'll update the
> > vhost.h once it lands on the mainline.
> 
> Humm, maybe its not a good idea to do that this cycle?

Maybe it's just me, but I've been looking sadly at all the header warnings 
for months. :-) Would be better to keep them in sync with a bit higher 
frequency, IMO - which would reduce the pain and churn rate:

> >  16 files changed, 809 insertions(+), 740 deletions(-)

That's like about a year of changes missed? An update once per cycle and 
this wouldn't be nearly as painful, right?

Thanks,

	Ingo