Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-136512-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.48.161;
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 09:59:16 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
Cc: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>, Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for i.MX
 BBM protocol
Message-ID: <ZhUDZGJilhczKlDD@bogus>
References: <20240405-imx95-bbm-misc-v2-v2-0-9fc9186856c2@nxp.com>
 <20240405-imx95-bbm-misc-v2-v2-3-9fc9186856c2@nxp.com>
 <ZhQxu8LVNKf5QDLm@pluto>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZhQxu8LVNKf5QDLm@pluto>

On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 07:04:43PM +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 08:39:25PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> > 
> > The i.MX BBM protocol is for managing i.MX BBM module which provides
> > RTC and BUTTON feature.
> > 
> 
> I appreciate that you added versioning but I think a bit of documentation
> about what the protocol and its comamnds purpose is still lacking, as asked
> by Sudeep previously
> 
> 	https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/ZeGtoJ7ztSe8Kg8R@bogus/#t
>

I have decided to ignore all these vendor protocol patches until they have
some documentation to understand what these protocol are for, what are
the commands, their input/output parameter details, any conditions are the
caller and callee,..etc very similar to SCMI spec.

To start with can you please expand what is BBM or MISC protocol is ?
Don't expect me to respond if the requested details are still missing in
the future versions, I am going to ignore it silently.

I have asked for these in atleast 2 different threads may be not just NXP
patches but in one instance Qcom patches, but they apply equally here.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep