Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:53:59 +0530
From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: don't take a mutex from interrupt context
Message-ID: <20080122172359.GA801@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reply-To: vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com
References: <20080122023626.GA12213@darkstar.te-china.tietoenator.com> <1201019138.6341.24.camel@lappy> <20080122165121.GE31049@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1201020454.6341.29.camel@lappy>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1201020454.6341.29.camel@lappy>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 560
Lines: 15

On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 05:47:34PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> It should not, that would be another bug, but from a quick glance at the
> code it doesn't do that.

Hmm I had it in my back of mind that printk() could sleep. Looks like
that has changed and so the patch you sent should be fine. 

Thanks!

- vatsa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/