Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-136917-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>, 
 Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <ZhJMuUYwaZbBXFGP@drtxq0yyyyyyyyyyyyydy-3.rev.dnainternet.fi>
References: <ZhJMuUYwaZbBXFGP@drtxq0yyyyyyyyyyyyydy-3.rev.dnainternet.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: irq_helpers: duplicate IRQ name
Message-Id: <171266808686.28431.8367231474074219890.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 14:08:06 +0100
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Sun, 07 Apr 2024 10:35:21 +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> The regulator IRQ helper requires caller to provide pointer to IRQ name
> which is kept in memory by caller. All other data passed to the helper
> in the regulator_irq_desc structure is copied. This can cause some
> confusion and unnecessary complexity.
> 
> Make the regulator_irq_helper() to copy also the provided IRQ name
> information so caller can discard the name after the call to
> regulator_irq_helper() completes.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] regulator: irq_helpers: duplicate IRQ name
      commit: 7ab681ddedd4b6dd2b047c74af95221c5f827e1d

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark