Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754340AbYAVTtT (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:49:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752092AbYAVTtJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:49:09 -0500 Received: from mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.47]:61482 "EHLO mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751866AbYAVTtI (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:49:08 -0500 From: Ian Campbell To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Mika =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Penttil=E4?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "Eric W. Biederman" In-Reply-To: <479634A9.1090908@zytor.com> References: <1200758937-22386-1-git-send-email-ijc@hellion.org.uk> <1200758937-22386-2-git-send-email-ijc@hellion.org.uk> <47939363.8040603@kolumbus.fi> <1200950633.15491.21.camel@cthulhu.hellion.org.uk> <479510CE.7010706@zytor.com> <1200951996.15491.28.camel@cthulhu.hellion.org.uk> <479551FD.5040801@zytor.com> <1201023401.5643.52.camel@localhost.localdomain> <479634A9.1090908@zytor.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:48:45 +0000 Message-Id: <1201031325.15491.66.camel@cthulhu.hellion.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.1.223 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ijc@hellion.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Construct 32 bit boot time page tables in native format. X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:23:22 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on hopkins.hellion.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1277 Lines: 33 On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 10:23 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Ian Campbell wrote: > > Anyhow, I don't feel all that strongly about it so if the opinion of the > > early start of day maintainer(s) is strongly in favour of ASM I'll defer > > to that. > > > > My opinion is that I want it done properly (PIC and all that jazz) or > not at all, and certainly would not want to mix linear and > paging-enabled code in the same file. When it comes to assembly code, > at least people can *see* that there there be dragons. > > The plus *and* minus of a C version is that it's easier for people to > modify. The plus side of that is that if we really need it, it's a lot > cleaner; the minus side is that it may encourage more code to creep into > the pre-paging code, which would not be a good thing IMO. Seems reasonable to me. I'll integrate your asm diff with the other changes and give it a whirl. Ian. -- Ian Campbell Never go to bed mad. Stay up and fight. -- Phyllis Diller, "Phyllis Diller's Housekeeping Hints" -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/