Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-137872-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20240409062407.1952728-1-lei.chen@smartx.com> <0e5a96b6-0862-4c00-b07f-7485af232475@lunn.ch>
 <CAKcXpBwE-8p+naDgJnCU41ODxRhWq7CkhEeeOAw+Ode4-J6CLw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKcXpBwE-8p+naDgJnCU41ODxRhWq7CkhEeeOAw+Ode4-J6CLw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 12:00:32 +0800
Message-ID: <CACGkMEuiROr4EydSp+HFgG2GPqsda0zpfge5DvsSDEbsyWDuLg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net:tun: limit printing rate when illegal packet received
 by tun dev
To: Lei Chen <lei.chen@smartx.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>, 
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>, 
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, 
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 10:23=E2=80=AFAM Lei Chen <lei.chen@smartx.com> wro=
te:
>
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 8:52=E2=80=AFPM Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> wrote=
:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 02:24:05AM -0400, Lei Chen wrote:
> > > vhost_worker will call tun call backs to receive packets. If too many
> > > illegal packets arrives, tun_do_read will keep dumping packet content=
s.
> > > When console is enabled, it will costs much more cpu time to dump
> > > packet and soft lockup will be detected.
> > >
> > > Rate limit mechanism can be used to limit the dumping rate.
> > > @@ -2125,14 +2126,16 @@ static ssize_t tun_put_user(struct tun_struct=
 *tun,
> > >                                           tun_is_little_endian(tun), =
true,
> > >                                           vlan_hlen)) {
> > >                       struct skb_shared_info *sinfo =3D skb_shinfo(sk=
b);
> > > -                     pr_err("unexpected GSO type: "
> > > -                            "0x%x, gso_size %d, hdr_len %d\n",
> > > -                            sinfo->gso_type, tun16_to_cpu(tun, gso.g=
so_size),
> > > -                            tun16_to_cpu(tun, gso.hdr_len));
> > > -                     print_hex_dump(KERN_ERR, "tun: ",
> > > -                                    DUMP_PREFIX_NONE,
> > > -                                    16, 1, skb->head,
> > > -                                    min((int)tun16_to_cpu(tun, gso.h=
dr_len), 64), true);
> > > +
> > > +                     if (__ratelimit(&ratelimit)) {
> >
> > Maybe just use net_ratelimit() rather than add a new ratelimit
> > variable?
>
> Thanks for your suggestion, net_ratelimit is a better way to make it.

+1

Thanks

>
> >
> > A separate issue, i wounder if rather than pr_err(),
> > netdev_err(tun->dev, ...) should be used to indicate which TUN device
> > has been given bad GSO packets?
>
> I got it, I'll remake the patch, thanks.
>