Received: by 2002:ab2:4a89:0:b0:1f4:a8b6:6e69 with SMTP id w9csp26034lqj; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 02:48:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCUu0N7YFKMHR1Xp0R8FToyL4lfTX+7Mhp6/BhfpK2QEBErJqPxv1rIETVqHs5oErunBF+pVL874r5+wveed1lRWRnx4rXVNNE1OpoU4Pw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHZrhhb8Jt8/q9lb60N3FSwca4qwPrZ7a83LFXu042bIRJVeNPdr8+BYx7Q3xd6QOiJC9sf X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a21:6d89:b0:1a3:afdc:fe5 with SMTP id wl9-20020a056a216d8900b001a3afdc0fe5mr2393342pzb.42.1712742525178; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 02:48:45 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from sy.mirrors.kernel.org (sy.mirrors.kernel.org. [147.75.48.161]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z4-20020a170902d54400b001e230699596si2418450plf.588.2024.04.10.02.48.44 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 10 Apr 2024 02:48:45 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-138274-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.48.161; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; arc=fail (body hash mismatch); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-138274-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-138274-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sy.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1667B21C16 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 09:46:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AE1A155A5F; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 09:46:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 715FA13D288 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 09:46:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712742395; cv=none; b=O29pma36qEoQoxlDc/esjkJM1hn3CcxJaNC82TJ6mvWEP0+u6wEbCDSB92v/5NyUNYBvwXYwzDxiraxspLrsg5/Nc/hqZUVa45JDwXlG6XnUXuWMw/y26xZk7p4ZKVSCZkHpM8Ly0HmE61lNb6WOoPtqRyk472GXr2VyGtUxwy0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712742395; c=relaxed/simple; bh=UNoP2XVBI7wf8bVP3cYd6NyBVQ0hNUiOERKtJo55hUs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=aiElFaM7zwGx7gBUi20V0g0qjmW8IO3Mon8MG0KxvfXQ/ExLlBUJQQcRYtiuZBY1SkYC6XzYkWvv5GSUu2iUr4kFKtrHdwwsVEC5yMvzyd/z6psq5Ae/HrvAaU72r9XanHI1Bmsushiz4joWI7pjLnoLI/NZKH0hzA/9B+5QHbg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB0B8139F; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 02:47:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from FVFF77S0Q05N (unknown [10.57.17.100]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F38383F6C4; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 02:46:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 10:46:24 +0100 From: Mark Rutland To: Ryan Roberts Cc: Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Ard Biesheuvel , David Hildenbrand , Donald Dutile , Eric Chanudet , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Itaru Kitayama Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] arm64: mm: Don't remap pgtables per-cont(pte|pmd) block Message-ID: References: <20240404143308.2224141-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com> <20240404143308.2224141-2-ryan.roberts@arm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240404143308.2224141-2-ryan.roberts@arm.com> On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 03:33:05PM +0100, Ryan Roberts wrote: > A large part of the kernel boot time is creating the kernel linear map > page tables. When rodata=full, all memory is mapped by pte. And when > there is lots of physical ram, there are lots of pte tables to populate. > The primary cost associated with this is mapping and unmapping the pte > table memory in the fixmap; at unmap time, the TLB entry must be > invalidated and this is expensive. > > Previously, each pmd and pte table was fixmapped/fixunmapped for each > cont(pte|pmd) block of mappings (16 entries with 4K granule). This means > we ended up issuing 32 TLBIs per (pmd|pte) table during the population > phase. > > Let's fix that, and fixmap/fixunmap each page once per population, for a > saving of 31 TLBIs per (pmd|pte) table. This gives a significant boot > speedup. > > Execution time of map_mem(), which creates the kernel linear map page > tables, was measured on different machines with different RAM configs: > > | Apple M2 VM | Ampere Altra| Ampere Altra| Ampere Altra > | VM, 16G | VM, 64G | VM, 256G | Metal, 512G > ---------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|------------- > | ms (%) | ms (%) | ms (%) | ms (%) > ---------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|------------- > before | 153 (0%) | 2227 (0%) | 8798 (0%) | 17442 (0%) > after | 77 (-49%) | 431 (-81%) | 1727 (-80%) | 3796 (-78%) > > Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts > Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama > Tested-by: Eric Chanudet > --- > arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++-------------- > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c > index 495b732d5af3..fd91b5bdb514 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c > @@ -172,12 +172,9 @@ bool pgattr_change_is_safe(u64 old, u64 new) > return ((old ^ new) & ~mask) == 0; > } > > -static void init_pte(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, > - phys_addr_t phys, pgprot_t prot) > +static pte_t *init_pte(pte_t *ptep, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, > + phys_addr_t phys, pgprot_t prot) > { > - pte_t *ptep; > - > - ptep = pte_set_fixmap_offset(pmdp, addr); > do { > pte_t old_pte = __ptep_get(ptep); > > @@ -193,7 +190,7 @@ static void init_pte(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, > phys += PAGE_SIZE; > } while (ptep++, addr += PAGE_SIZE, addr != end); > > - pte_clear_fixmap(); > + return ptep; > } > > static void alloc_init_cont_pte(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr, > @@ -204,6 +201,7 @@ static void alloc_init_cont_pte(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr, > { > unsigned long next; > pmd_t pmd = READ_ONCE(*pmdp); > + pte_t *ptep; > > BUG_ON(pmd_sect(pmd)); > if (pmd_none(pmd)) { > @@ -219,6 +217,7 @@ static void alloc_init_cont_pte(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr, > } > BUG_ON(pmd_bad(pmd)); > > + ptep = pte_set_fixmap_offset(pmdp, addr); > do { > pgprot_t __prot = prot; > > @@ -229,20 +228,20 @@ static void alloc_init_cont_pte(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr, > (flags & NO_CONT_MAPPINGS) == 0) > __prot = __pgprot(pgprot_val(prot) | PTE_CONT); > > - init_pte(pmdp, addr, next, phys, __prot); > + ptep = init_pte(ptep, addr, next, phys, __prot); > > phys += next - addr; > } while (addr = next, addr != end); I reckon it might be better to leave init_pte() returning void, and move the ptep along here, e.g. ptep = pte_set_fixmap_offset(pmdp, addr); do { ... init_pte(ptep, addr, next, phys, __prot); ptep += pte_index(next) - pte_index(addr); phys += next - addr; } while (addr = next, addr != end); .. as that keeps the relationship between 'ptep' and 'phys' clear since they're manipulated in the same way, adjacent to one another. Regardless this looks good, so with that change or as-is: Acked-by: Mark Rutland .. though I would prefer with that change. ;) Mark.