Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-138740-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] selftests: sud_test: return correct emulated syscall value
 on RISC-V
From: patchwork-bot+linux-riscv@kernel.org
Message-Id: 
 <171275883341.18495.6912537160519241189.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 14:20:33 +0000
References: <20231206134438.473166-1-cleger@rivosinc.com>
In-Reply-To: <20231206134438.473166-1-cleger@rivosinc.com>
To: =?utf-8?b?Q2zDqW1lbnQgTMOpZ2VyIDxjbGVnZXJAcml2b3NpbmMuY29tPg==?=@codeaurora.org
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, shuah@kernel.org,
 krisman@collabora.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, palmer@rivosinc.com, bjorn@rivosinc.com

Hello:

This patch was applied to riscv/linux.git (for-next)
by Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>:

On Wed,  6 Dec 2023 14:44:37 +0100 you wrote:
> Currently, the sud_test expects the emulated syscall to return the
> emulated syscall number. This assumption only works on architectures
> were the syscall calling convention use the same register for syscall
> number/syscall return value. This is not the case for RISC-V and thus
> the return value must be also emulated using the provided ucontext.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <cleger@rivosinc.com>
> Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
> Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [v2] selftests: sud_test: return correct emulated syscall value on RISC-V
    https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/bac292e849d7

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html