Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755658AbYAWDCD (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:02:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755065AbYAWDBv (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:01:51 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:35108 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754955AbYAWDBu (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:01:50 -0500 To: mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Rusty Russell , Jon Masters Subject: Re: CONFIG_MARKERS References: <1201029235.18144.62.camel@perihelion> From: fche@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler) Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:00:33 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1201029235.18144.62.camel@perihelion> (Jon Masters's message of "Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:13:55 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 726 Lines: 23 Jon Masters writes: > I notice in module.c: > > #ifdef CONFIG_MARKERS > if (!mod->taints) > marker_update_probe_range(mod->markers, > mod->markers + mod->num_markers, NULL, NULL); > #endif > > Is this an attempt to not set a marker for proprietary modules? [...] I can't seem to find any discussion about this aspect. If this is the intent, it seems misguided to me. There may instead be a relationship to TAINT_FORCED_{RMMOD,MODULE}. Mathieu? - FChE -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/