Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-140254-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:31:37 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/arm-cmn: Set PMU device parent
Message-ID: <20240411103137.GA26072@willie-the-truck>
References: <25d4428df1ddad966c74a3ed60171cd3ca6c8b66.1712682917.git.robin.murphy@arm.com>
 <20240410180403.00004cff@Huawei.com>
 <20240410181226.000068eb@Huawei.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240410181226.000068eb@Huawei.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)

On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 06:12:26PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 18:04:03 +0100
> Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue,  9 Apr 2024 18:15:17 +0100
> > Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Now that perf supports giving the PMU device a parent, we can use our
> > > platform device to make the relationship between CMN instances and PMU
> > > IDs trivially discoverable, from either nominal direction:
> > > 
> > > root@crazy-taxi:~# ls /sys/devices/platform/ARMHC600:00 | grep cmn
> > > arm_cmn_0
> > > root@crazy-taxi:~# realpath /sys/bus/event_source/devices/arm_cmn_0/..
> > > /sys/devices/platform/ARMHC600:00
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>  
> > Nice.  I'd forgotten all about this :( 
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230404134225.13408-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com/
> > still has a bunch of these + there were many I never looked into.
> > 
> > Guess I should respin that series though probably 50% at least still apply.
> 
> Ironically other than this one, almost the only ones that didn't go in cleanly
> are the hisilicon drivers where there was some churn.
> 
> Will, if you 'want' to pick any of those up directly feel free, if not I'll sent
> them out again in a few days time (and check there weren't any requests for
> changes buried in that rather extensive thread!)

It's probably best to send a new series regardless, but I'm happy to
pick up anything touching drivers/perf/ if they don't depend on any core
changes.

Will